Is analysis necessary to know topology and differential geometry?

In summary, a physics major is interested in taking upper level math classes such as topology, differential geometry, and group theory. These classes are only taught in the math department and require a heavy background in proofs. Although analysis is a recommended prerequisite, it is not necessary. There are good books available for non-pure math majors to learn analysis and get introduced to proofs. Real analysis is important for studying topology and differential geometry, and it is often a prerequisite for these courses. A good book for real analysis is "Real Analysis" by Carothers, but there are also other options such as "Introduction to Analysis" by Rosenlicht. Prior knowledge of theoretical linear algebra is also necessary for studying differential geometry. Some recommended books for studying linear algebra are
  • #36
R136a1 said:
Group theory: mathematics courses usually focus on finite groups, while physicists usually use infinite matrix groups. For this reason, math courses on group theory do not tend to be very useful.
Finite groups matter too! I think an algebra course on group theory could be fairly useful so long as one doesn't stick around for ring and field theory (as those have not been as useful in my experience).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Jorriss said:
Finite groups matter too!

I'm sure they do. But once they get into Sylow theorems and simple groups, I think it's a bit less useful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
965
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
898
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top