MHB Is \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\) a Right Ideal of \(\prod_\Delta R_\alpha\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Section
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\) is a right ideal of \(\prod_\Delta R_\alpha\), with a focus on the proof provided by a user named Peter. Peter demonstrates that the sum of two elements in \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\) remains in the same set, and that the product of an element from \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\) with an element from \(\prod_\Delta R_\alpha\) also stays within \(\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha\). The proof is confirmed as correct by another participant, Steenis, who also engages in light conversation about drinking. The thread concludes with Peter acknowledging the feedback.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book: Rings and Their Modules and am currently focused on Section 2.1 Direct Products and Direct Sums ... ...

I need someone to check my solution to Problem 2(b) of Problem Set 2.1 ...

Problem 2(b) of Problem Set 2.1 reads as follows:
View attachment 8060
My attempt at a solution follows:We claim that $$\bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$ Proof ... Let $$(x_\alpha ) , (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ and let $$(r_\alpha ) \in \prod_\Delta R_\alpha$$Then $$ (x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ ...

... further ... if $$(x_\alpha )$$ has $$m$$ non-zero components and $$(y_\alpha $$) has $$n$$ non-zero components then $$ (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ has at most $$(m+n)$$ non-zero components ... that is $$ (x_\alpha + y_\alpha )$$ has only a finite number of non-zero components ...

... so ... since each $$x_\alpha + y_\alpha \in A_\alpha$$ we have that $$(x_\alpha + y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ...

Hence ... $$(x_\alpha ) + (y_\alpha ) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ... ... ... ... ... (1)
Also ... we have ...

$$(x_\alpha ) (r_\alpha ) = (x_\alpha r_\alpha)$$

... and assuming $$x_\alpha$$ has $$m$$ non-zero components, then $$(x_\alpha r_\alpha$$) has at most $$m$$ non-zero components ...... and ...$$x_\alpha r_\alpha \in A_\alpha$$ since $$A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$R_\alpha$$so $$(x_\alpha r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$and it follows that $$(x_\alpha) ( r_\alpha) \in \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ ... ... ... ... ... (2)$$(1) (2) \Longrightarrow \bigoplus_\Delta A_\alpha$$ is a right ideal of $$\prod_\Delta R_\alpha $$
Can someone please critique my proof either by confirming it to be correct and/or pointing out errors and shortcomings ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is correct, Peter.
Why aren't you drinking XXXX in Victoria?
 
steenis said:
This is correct, Peter.
Why aren't you drinking XXXX in Victoria?
THanks Steenis ...

... well, staying with a friend who doesn't drink ...

But had a couple of drinks of whisky and soda last night ... :) ...

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K