Is Every Non-Essential Dollar Spent Contributing to Global Suffering?

  • News
  • Thread starter Moridin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Blood Money
In summary, Peter Unger believes that any money not spent on essential survival items indirectly contributes to the suffering of starving children. The conversation then turns to the issue of food surplus and how politics and environmental concerns hinder the distribution of these resources to those in need.
  • #1
Moridin
692
3
Peter Unger has argued that every single dollar you do not spend on anything but the absolute essentials of our survival is a dollar that has some starving child's blood on it. What are your opinions on this statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
When tons of wheat and other grains we shipped to third world countries sits and rots instead of being grown or eaten because wheat from the US may be genetically modified and the third world countries don't want to be banned from dealing with the EU which has banned genetically modified grains. Come back when some sanity is involved in how food surplusses are delivered to the starving without politicians and environmentalists groups interfering.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


I approach this statement from a logical and evidence-based perspective. While it is true that there are many people in the world who are suffering from poverty and lack of access to basic necessities, it is not accurate to say that every dollar we do not spend on non-essential items is directly responsible for causing harm or suffering to others.

There are many factors that contribute to poverty and hunger, including political and economic systems, natural disasters, and societal inequalities. While our consumer choices may play a role in these larger systems, it is not fair to place the blame solely on individuals for the suffering of others.

Furthermore, it is important to consider the complexities of global trade and production. Many products that we consume are made and sourced from different parts of the world, and it is difficult to trace the exact origins and impacts of each dollar we spend.

That being said, as consumers, it is important for us to be mindful of the ethical and social implications of our purchases. We should strive to support companies and products that prioritize fair labor practices and sustainability. However, it is not productive or accurate to assign guilt and responsibility for global issues to individuals based on their spending habits alone. Instead, we should work towards systemic and structural changes that address poverty and inequality on a larger scale.
 

FAQ: Is Every Non-Essential Dollar Spent Contributing to Global Suffering?

Who is Peter Unger?

Peter Unger is a philosopher and professor at New York University. He is best known for his work in metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.

What is the concept of "blood money" in Unger's work?

In his book "Living High and Letting Die", Unger introduces the concept of "blood money" as a way to explore moral responsibility and ethical implications of wealthy individuals who do not donate a significant portion of their wealth to help others in need.

How does Unger defend his argument about blood money?

Unger argues that individuals who have a significant amount of wealth have a moral obligation to use it to help others in need, and failing to do so is equivalent to causing harm to those in need. He also suggests that it is not enough to donate a small portion of one's wealth, but rather a significant portion to make a real impact.

What are some criticisms of Unger's argument?

Some critics argue that Unger's argument is too extreme and does not take into account the complexities of wealth distribution and individual circumstances. Others argue that his argument is impractical and would lead to negative consequences for both the wealthy and those in need.

How has Unger's work on blood money influenced ethical discussions?

Unger's work on blood money has sparked important discussions about moral responsibility and the ethical implications of wealth. It has also prompted individuals to consider their own actions and the impact of their wealth on others. Additionally, it has been a significant contribution to the field of ethics and has influenced other philosophers and academics in their own work.

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
34
Views
11K
Back
Top