Is φ a bijective homomorphism between simple $R$-modules?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Isomorphism
In summary, we have a commutative ring with unit $R$ and a $R$-module $M$. We also have a non-zero homomorphism $\phi$ from $M$ to $M'$. Our goal is to show that $\phi$ is an isomorphism. To do so, we need to show that $\phi$ is both bijective and a homomorphism. We also have the definitions of $M'$ and $\ker\phi$, which play a crucial role in our proof. By considering the properties of $M'$ and $\ker\phi$, we can conclude that $\phi$ is indeed bijective, and therefore an isomorphism.
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit and $M$ be a $R$-module.

Let $\phi : M\rightarrow M'$ be a non-zero homomorphism of simple $R$-module.
I want to show that $\phi$ is an isomorphism.

To show that we have to show that $\phi$ is bijective, right? (Wondering)

What exactly is the definition of $M'$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mathmari said:
To show that we have to show that $\phi$ is bijective, right? (Wondering)

Yes, that's right.

What exactly is the definition of $M'$ ? (Wondering)
$M'$ is a simple $R$-module.
 
  • #3
We have that $\text{Im}\phi $ is a $R$-submodule of $M'$. Since $M'$ is simple, it follows that $\text{Im}\phi=O$ or $\text{Im}\phi=M'$.
Since $\phi$ is a non-zero homomorphism, it must be $\text{Im}\phi=M'$, right? (Wondering)
If this is correct, it follows that $\phi$ is onto, or not? (Wondering)

We also have that $\ker\phi $ is a $R$-submodule of $M$. Since $M$ is simple, it follows that $\ker\phi=O$ or $\ker\phi=M$.
The kernel is equal to the set of elements mapped to $0$. Since $\phi$ is non-zero, it must be that $\ker\phi=O$, right? (Wondering)
If this is correct, it follows that $\phi$ is 1-1, or not? (Wondering) Therefore, $\phi$ is bijective.
 
  • #4
You are correct on all points. (Nod)
 

FAQ: Is φ a bijective homomorphism between simple $R$-modules?

What is an isomorphism?

An isomorphism is a mathematical concept that describes a one-to-one mapping between two structures, such as groups, rings, or vector spaces, that preserves the underlying operations and structure.

How can we show that φ is an isomorphism?

To show that φ is an isomorphism, we must demonstrate that it is a bijective and homomorphic mapping between two structures. This means that φ is both one-to-one and onto, and that it preserves the operations and structure of the two structures.

What is the significance of proving that φ is an isomorphism?

Proving that φ is an isomorphism provides insight into the relationship between two structures. It shows that the two structures are essentially the same, and that any properties or characteristics of one structure can be applied to the other through the isomorphism.

What are the consequences if φ is not an isomorphism?

If φ is not an isomorphism, it means that there is no one-to-one mapping between the two structures that preserves their operations and structure. This can lead to contradictions and difficulties when trying to apply properties or characteristics of one structure to the other.

Can φ be an isomorphism between two different types of structures?

Yes, φ can be an isomorphism between two different types of structures as long as it satisfies the criteria of being a bijective and homomorphic mapping. This means that the two structures do not have to be identical, but they must have similar operations and structure that can be preserved by the isomorphism.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top