Is $f$ an isometry and $X$ compact implies $f$ is bijective and a homeomorphism?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date
In summary, an isometry is a transformation that preserves distances between points in both the original and transformed spaces. For $f$ to be an isometry, it must be a one-to-one and onto mapping. The compactness of $X$ in this statement guarantees that $f$ is continuous, and therefore bijective. Additionally, $f$ must be a homeomorphism in order for it to be both continuous and bijective, as well as for its inverse to be continuous.
  • #1
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
915
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. If $f:X\rightarrow X$ satisfies the condition
\[d(f(x),f(y))=d(x,y)\]
for all $x,y\in X$, then $f$ is called an isometry of $X$. Show that if $f$ is an isometry and $X$ is compact, then $f$ is bijective and hence a homeomorphism.

-----

Hint:
If $a\notin f(X)$, choose $\epsilon$ so that the $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $a$ is disjoint from $f(X)$. Set $x_1=a$, and $x_{n+1}=f(x_n)$ in general. Show that $d(x_n,x_m)\geq \epsilon$ for $n\neq m$.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No one answered this week's problem. You can find the solution below.

Proof: Let $a\notin f(X)$. Since $d$ is continuous, we have that it maps $X$ (which is compact) to a compact set. Thus, $X\backslash f(X)$ is open and some $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $a$ is disjoint from $f(X)$. In that case, $d(a,f(a))=l>\epsilon$. By the isometry property, $d(f(a),f(f(a)))=l$ and so on. Hence, by iterating the application of $f$ to $a$, we generate an infinite sequence of points in $f(X)$ (that is, $f(a)$, $f(f(a))$, $f(f(f(a)))$, etc). Let's call these points $a_1$, $a_2$, $a_3$, etc. Observe that $d(a_j,a_k)$ for any $j,k$ with $k>j$ will be the same as $d(a,a_{k-j})$ by the isometry property and since $d(a,a_{k-j})>\epsilon$, it follows that all of the points in the sequence $(a_i)$ are farther than $\epsilon$ from one another. Thus, we have an infinite sequence with no convergent subsequence, which contradicts the assumption of $X$ being compact. Therefore, $f$ must be surjective. It's also clear from the isometry property that $f$ is injective, hence $f$ is bijective. Furthermore, since isometry guarantees the continuity of $f^{-1}$, we have that $f$ is a homeomorphism. $\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$
 

FAQ: Is $f$ an isometry and $X$ compact implies $f$ is bijective and a homeomorphism?

What is an isometry?

An isometry is a type of transformation that preserves distances between points. In other words, the distance between any two points in the original space will be equal to the distance between those two points in the transformed space.

What does it mean for $f$ to be an isometry?

If $f$ is an isometry, it means that it is a one-to-one and onto mapping that preserves distances between points in the original and transformed spaces.

What is the significance of $X$ being compact in this statement?

A compact space is a topological space that is both closed and bounded, meaning that it contains all of its limit points and can be contained within a finite-sized region. In this statement, the compactness of $X$ ensures that $f$ is a continuous mapping.

How does the compactness of $X$ relate to the bijectivity of $f$ in this statement?

The compactness of $X$ guarantees that $f$ is a one-to-one mapping, as it ensures that each point in the transformed space has a unique corresponding point in the original space. This is necessary for $f$ to be bijective.

Why is it important for $f$ to be a homeomorphism in this statement?

A homeomorphism is a type of mapping that preserves the topological properties of a space. In this statement, it guarantees that $f$ is not only a continuous and one-to-one mapping, but also that its inverse is also continuous. This is necessary for $f$ to be a bijective and a homeomorphism.

Back
Top