Is G isomorphic to H x K? A Surjective Mapping Analysis

  • Thread starter NasuSama
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Groups
In summary, the conversation discusses whether G, a specific group of matrices, is isomorphic to the Cartesian product of two other groups, H and K. In order for G to be isomorphic to H x K, there must exist an isomorphism between the two groups. A function, phi, is proposed as a possible isomorphism, but it is shown that the mapping is not injective and therefore cannot be a bijection. The multiplication operation for the group H x K is also discussed, but it is concluded that G is not isomorphic to H x K.
  • #1
NasuSama
326
3

Homework Statement



Let:

[itex]G = { \begin{bmatrix}
a & b \\
0 & c
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

[itex]H = { \begin{bmatrix}
a & 0 \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

[itex]K = { \begin{bmatrix}
1 & a \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

Is [itex]G[/itex] isomorphic to [itex]H x K[/itex]?

Homework Equations



Definition of Isomorphism

The Attempt at a Solution



In order for [itex]G \approx H x K[/itex], there exists an isomorphism from [itex]G[/itex] to [itex]H x K[/itex]. In order for the mapping to be injective, its kernel must consist of only identity element. The inverse of the function must also exist in order for the mapping to be surjective. Oh! That function needs to be homomorphism.

I let:

[itex]\phi : G \rightarrow H x K[/itex]
[itex]

\begin{bmatrix}
a & b \\
0 & c
\end{bmatrix}

\rightarrow

(
\begin{bmatrix}
a & 0 \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix}
,
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & a \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}
)
[/itex]

I would say that [itex]G[/itex] is not isomorphic to [itex]H x K[/itex] since kernel of the mapping is empty. If we take a = c = 1 and b = 0, then this gives:

[itex]
(
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
,
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}
)
[/itex]

Taking the identity matrix for the mapping doesn't give identity matrices as shown here. No matter what values of a, b and c we take, we don't get the identity matrices.

So G is not isomorphic to H x K?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
NasuSama said:

Homework Statement



Let:

[itex]G = { \begin{bmatrix}
a & b \\
0 & c
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

[itex]H = { \begin{bmatrix}
a & 0 \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

[itex]K = { \begin{bmatrix}
1 & a \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix} \in GL(2,ℝ)}[/itex]

Is [itex]G[/itex] isomorphic to [itex]H x K[/itex]?

Homework Equations



Definition of Isomorphism

The Attempt at a Solution



In order for [itex]G \approx H x K[/itex], there exists an isomorphism from [itex]G[/itex] to [itex]H x K[/itex]. In order for the mapping to be injective, its kernel must consist of only identity element. The inverse of the function must also exist in order for the mapping to be surjective. Oh! That function needs to be homomorphism.

I let:

[itex]\phi : G \rightarrow H x K[/itex]
[itex]

\begin{bmatrix}
a & b \\
0 & c
\end{bmatrix}

\rightarrow

(
\begin{bmatrix}
a & 0 \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix}
,
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & a \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}
)
[/itex]

I would say that [itex]G[/itex] is not isomorphic to [itex]H x K[/itex] since kernel of the mapping is empty. If we take a = c = 1 and b = 0, then this gives:

[itex]
(
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
,
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix}
)
[/itex]

Taking the identity matrix for the mapping doesn't give identity matrices as shown here. No matter what values of a, b and c we take, we don't get the identity matrices.

So G is not isomorphic to H x K?
You have only shown that there's one function that isn't an isomorphism.

The ##\phi## you chose is pretty strange, because there's no c on the right-hand side of the definition. This makes it impossible for the function to be a bijection (which an isomorphism must be). If you want to prove that the groups are isomorphic (I don't know if they are), you should first find a bijection, and then check if it's an isomorphism.

You should post your definition of the group you denoted by ##H\times K##. What is the multiplication operation of that group?

LaTeX tip: \times, \otimes ##\times,\otimes##
 
  • #3
Fredrik said:
You have only shown that there's one function that isn't an isomorphism.

The ##\phi## you chose is pretty strange, because there's no c on the right-hand side of the definition. This makes it impossible for the function to be a bijection (which an isomorphism must be). If you want to prove that the groups are isomorphic (I don't know if they are), you should first find a bijection, and then check if it's an isomorphism.

You should post your definition of the group you denoted by ##H\times K##. What is the multiplication operation of that group?

LaTeX tip: \times, \otimes ##\times,\otimes##

[itex]H \times K[/itex] is the Cartesian product of H and K. It's denoted by:

[itex](\begin{bmatrix}
a & 0 \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix},
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & a \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix})[/itex]

I am not sure how to find the bijection for this type of problem..
 
  • #4
Yes, but what is the multiplication operation? What is the product of two arbitrary members of ##H\times K##? An isomorphism is a bijective homomorphism from a group into a group, but you have defined ##H\times K## as a set, not as a group.
 
  • #5
Fredrik said:
Yes, but what is the multiplication operation? What is the product of two arbitrary members of ##H\times K##? An isomorphism is a bijective homomorphism from a group into a group, but you have defined ##H\times K## as a set, not as a group.

It's something that you multiply the pairs of matrices component-wise to get the group. For instance:

[itex](a,a') \cdot (b,b') = (ab,a'b')[/itex]

But we don't know what is a' and b'. I'm thinking carefully about this problem when you said that I formed the set, not a group (which is indeed right!).

However, I'm thinking of the multiplication of two matrices. But we have the Cartesian product. Not sure where to start off.
 
  • #6
NasuSama said:
It's something that you multiply the pairs of matrices component-wise to get the group. For instance:

[itex](a,a') \cdot (b,b') = (ab,a'b')[/itex]

But we don't know what is a' and b'.
This equality is the end of a statement that begins with "For all ##a,b\in H## and all ##a',b'\in K##".

It's easier to keep things straight in your head if you use a more suggestive notation like (h,k)(h',k')=(hh',kk').

If
$$h=\begin{bmatrix}a & 0\\ 0 & b\end{bmatrix},\quad k=\begin{bmatrix}1 & c\\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix},\quad h'=\begin{bmatrix}a' & 0\\ 0 & b'\end{bmatrix},\quad k'=\begin{bmatrix}1 & c'\\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix},$$ what is (h,k)(h',k')?
 
  • #7
Fredrik said:
This equality is the end of a statement that begins with "For all ##a,b\in H## and all ##a',b'\in K##".

It's easier to keep things straight in your head if you use a more suggestive notation like (h,k)(h',k')=(hh',kk').

If
$$h=\begin{bmatrix}a & 0\\ 0 & b\end{bmatrix},\quad k=\begin{bmatrix}1 & c\\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix},\quad h'=\begin{bmatrix}a' & 0\\ 0 & b'\end{bmatrix},\quad k'=\begin{bmatrix}1 & c'\\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix},$$ what is (h,k)(h',k')?

By multiplying the matrices coordinate-wise, I obtain:

[itex](\begin{bmatrix}
a & ac \\
0 & b
\end{bmatrix},
\begin{bmatrix}
a' & a'c' \\
0 & b'
\end{bmatrix})
[/itex]
 
  • #8
Are you sure about that? :smile:

(It looks like you computed (hk,h'k') instead of (hh',kk')).
 
  • #9
Oops. Sorry about that. I rushed through the computation. I attempt to do it in my head, but I have the wrong one! :)

[itex](\begin{bmatrix}
aa' & 0 \\
0 & bb'
\end{bmatrix},
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & c + c' \\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix})[/itex]
 
  • #10
Right, so now you're looking for a bijection ##\phi:G\to H\times K## such that ##\phi(xy)=\phi(x)(y)## for all ##x,y\in G##. Ignore that condition for a while. Can you think of any bijection at all?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Fredrik said:
Right, so now you're looking for a bijection ##\phi:G\to H\times K## such that ##\phi(xy)=\phi(x)(y)## for all ##x,y\in G##. Ignore that condition for a while. Can you think of any bijection at all?

I am not sure if this works. Would it be the identity homomorphism?
 
  • #12
Or probably I'm guessing for no good. In order for the homomorphism to be the bijection, it needs to be surjective and injective.

I think the identity homomorphism is a bijection (I mean any matrix mapped into the identity element regardless of the variables a, b and c.). Would there be more isomorphism besides of that?

This is getting my head spinning around since this question requires me to think. :|
 
  • #13
It should be pretty easy to find a bijection. The first thing I wrote down that made any sense to me turned out to be a bijection. (It turned out to not be a homomorphism, but let's not worry about that just yet). Can you write down any ##\phi:G\to H\times K## at all?

It helps to consider this: What does a typical member of G look like? What does a typical member of H×K look like?

A function that takes everything to the identity is a homomorphism, but such a function is obviously not a surjection unless the codomain is a trivial group (i.e. a group with only one element).
 
  • #14
The member of G, the set, would look like the 2 by 2 upper triangular matrix.
The member of H x K would look like the "point" with two diagonal matrices.

I guess I am confused with the variables a, b and c my instructor used for the problem. :\
 
  • #15
I believe this is a bijection.

[itex]\begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ 0 & c \end{bmatrix} \rightarrow (\begin{bmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & c \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 1 & b \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}) [/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #16
See, that wasn't so hard was it? :smile: This is the function I had in mind when I said that the first thing I wrote down turned out to be a bijection.

I could immediately see that the function you wrote down in post #1 isn't a bijection, because it didn't mention c on the right. This made it impossible for it to be injective.
 
  • #17
Fredrik said:
See, that wasn't so hard was it? :smile: This is the function I had in mind when I said that the first thing I wrote down turned out to be a bijection.

I could immediately see that the function you wrote down in post #1 isn't a bijection, because it didn't mention c on the right. This made it impossible for it to be injective.

But how do you know it's surjective?
 
  • #18
It's a straightforward application of the definition of "surjective". Do you know that definition?
 

Related to Is G isomorphic to H x K? A Surjective Mapping Analysis

1. What is the definition of isomorphic groups?

An isomorphic group is a mathematical concept that describes two groups that have the same structure and can be mapped onto each other in a one-to-one correspondence. This means that the elements of the two groups behave in the same way under the group operations.

2. How can you tell if two groups are isomorphic?

To determine if two groups are isomorphic, you need to check if there is a bijective homomorphism between them. This means that there is a one-to-one mapping between the elements of the two groups that preserves the group operations.

3. What are the key properties of isomorphic groups?

Isomorphic groups have the same number of elements, the same group operations (such as addition or multiplication), and the same structure, meaning the same way the elements are related to each other. Isomorphism is also transitive, meaning if Group A is isomorphic to Group B, and Group B is isomorphic to Group C, then Group A is also isomorphic to Group C.

4. Can two groups with different elements be isomorphic?

No, two groups with different elements cannot be isomorphic. Isomorphism depends on the structure and behavior of the elements, not just the number of elements. Two groups with different elements will have different group operations and therefore cannot be isomorphic.

5. What is the importance of isomorphic groups in mathematics?

Isomorphic groups are important in mathematics because they allow us to study different groups that have the same underlying structure. This can help us better understand the properties and behaviors of groups, as well as make connections between seemingly different groups. Isomorphism also allows us to apply knowledge from one group to another, making problem-solving and proofs more efficient.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
436
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
728
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
107
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top