- #1
Entheos
- 27
- 0
cucumber said:i wonder, if i was in a constant state of happiness, would i notice at all?
isn't happiness when something is better than usual, or than it used to be?
if everyone was happy all the time, there would be no way of appreciating ones happiness as there would be no comparative sadness.
then happiness would be greater happiness and sadness would be less happiness, as it were, and we are back on square one.
"The Hedonistic Imperative" is a book written by philosopher David Pearce, which outlines his vision for a future society where all forms of suffering are eliminated and only pleasure and happiness exist.
Pearce's proposal centers around the use of advanced technology, such as genetic engineering and artificial intelligence, to rewire the human brain and eliminate the biological causes of suffering. He also advocates for a shift towards a more empathetic and compassionate society.
Many scientists and philosophers have debated the feasibility of Pearce's vision. Some argue that it is too far-fetched and unrealistic, while others see potential in the use of technology to improve human well-being. Ultimately, the feasibility of "The Hedonistic Imperative" remains a topic of ongoing discussion and speculation.
Some critics argue that eliminating all forms of suffering may have unintended consequences, such as a lack of motivation and fulfillment in life. Others raise ethical concerns about the use of technology to manipulate human biology and behavior. Additionally, the practicality and cost of implementing such a drastic societal change have also been questioned.
Pearce envisions a society where all individuals have equal access to the tools and resources needed to eliminate suffering and achieve happiness. He believes that by eliminating suffering, the root causes of inequality and social injustice will also be addressed. However, critics point out that this may not necessarily be the case and that structural inequalities may still exist even in a world without suffering.