B Is Gravity Impacting Projectile Range Beyond Air Resistance Effects?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that while air resistance reduces the maximum range of a projectile, gravity also plays a significant role in diminishing initial velocity, particularly when launched at a 45-degree angle. It is noted that the constant propulsive force leads to a velocity reduction of approximately 3 m/sec due to gravity, indicating that not all range loss can be attributed to drag. The conversation emphasizes the need for authoritative confirmation regarding the impact of gravity on projectile range. Additionally, it mentions that the speed loss during ascent is compensated by speed gain during descent, aided by gravity. The interaction between gravity and air resistance in projectile motion is a key focus of the discussion.
Amateur999
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Drag and projectile motion
Calculated maximum range of arrow at 45 degrees with initial velocity measured horizontally is of course reduced by air resistance. BUT initial velocity at 45 is reduced because propulsive force is constant and gravity reduces velocity by about 3m/sec. So not all distance loss is drag. Authors attibute all loss to drag so i need authorative confirmation of this extra factor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amateur999 said:
BUT initial velocity at 45 is reduced because propulsive force is constant and gravity reduces velocity by about 3m/sec.
The loss of speed as the arrow climbs is made up for by the gain as it descends and gravity is helping.
 
Amateur999 said:
BUT initial velocity at 45 is reduced because propulsive force is constant and gravity reduces velocity by about 3m/sec.
Welcome!
Could you explain that part?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top