Is Holmes' Conclusion About Moriarty's Fate Correct?

  • Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date
In summary, an argument is a set of statements used to support a conclusion and persuade others of its validity. A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while an invalid argument is one where the conclusion does not logically follow. To determine the validity of an argument, the logical structure must be analyzed, and an invalid argument can still have a true conclusion.
  • #1
charmedbeauty
271
0

Homework Statement



"Watson, I have uncovered the following facts:

* If Mrs Smith is lying then Moriarty has not escaped
* Either Moriarty is dead or he is really Jones
*If Moriarty is really Jones then he has escaped.
*I am convinced Mrs Smith is lying.

"Good Lord Holmes," replied Dr Watson, "what can you make of all this?"
"Elementary my dear Watson, Moriarty is dead."

Is Holmes correct? Justify your answer.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I started by

Let

A = Mrs. Smith is lying.
B = Moriarty has escaped.
C = Moriarty is really Jones.
D = Moriarty is dead.

so then we have

A→~B
D→~C
C→B
A
_______
∴ D

Is this the correct way of setting out the Argument... I was a little confused as how to approach the either in the second line.
And the last line before the conclusion should that just be A?

After this am I supposed to use a contradiction to prove it??
ie do I assume that D is false??
This is really confusing me!

Help Please..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That looks alright to me, except if you say "A" therefore "D" you might want to elaborate out a bit more.

So if you say A, then you go back and look at what you've constructed:

A

A->~B [Mr. Smith is lying, therefore Moriarty has not escaped]
~B->~C [Moriarty has not escaped, therefore Moriarty is not Jones]
~C->D, [Moriarty is not Jones, therefore he is dead]

There are several ways to do this, this is essentially propositional logic.
 
  • #3
So is that all you have to say...
NewtonianAlch said:
Assume A is true, Therefore,

A->~B [Mr. Smith is lying, therefore Moriarty has not escaped]
~B->~C [Moriarty has not escaped, therefore Moriarty is not Jones]
~C->D, [Moriarty is not Jones, therefore he is dead]

Therefore Holmes is correct.
??
 
  • #4
The "either-or" is a so called exclusive or:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XorEither D and not C, or not D and C.

Symbollically: D.~C + ~D.CLuckily the result is the same.
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
The "either-or" is a so called exclusive or:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xor


Either D and not C, or not D and C.

Symbollically: D.~C + ~D.C


Luckily the result is the same.

Ok thanks!
 
  • #6
Here is how I would do this.

A * If Mrs Smith is lying then Moriarty has not escaped
B * Either Moriarty is dead or he is really Jones
C *If Moriarty is really Jones then he has escaped.
D *I am convinced Mrs Smith is lying.

Since D, Mrs Smith is lying. So from A, Moriarty has not escaped. C is equivalent to its "contrapositive" which is "If Moriarty has not escaped, then he is not really Jones. Since "he is really Jones" is false, the other possibility in B, "Moriarty is dead" must be true.
 

FAQ: Is Holmes' Conclusion About Moriarty's Fate Correct?

What is an argument?

An argument is a collection of statements, some of which are intended to support a conclusion. Arguments are used to persuade others of the validity of a certain claim or idea.

What is a valid argument?

A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. In other words, a valid argument is one in which the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.

What is an invalid argument?

An invalid argument is one in which the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. This means that even if the premises are true, the conclusion can still be false. In other words, an invalid argument is one in which the conclusion can be false even if the premises are true.

How do you determine the validity of an argument?

To determine the validity of an argument, you must analyze the logical structure of the argument. This involves identifying the premises and the conclusion, and then evaluating whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If it does, the argument is valid; if it does not, the argument is invalid.

Can an invalid argument still have a true conclusion?

Yes, an invalid argument can still have a true conclusion. The validity of an argument is determined by its logical structure, not the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion. This means that even if the conclusion of an argument is true, the argument can still be invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.

Similar threads

Back
Top