Is It an $\arctan$, $\arccot$, or Something Else in This Integral Solution?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Lorena_Santoro
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the conversation revolved around partial fraction decomposition and determining the correct choice for the given expression. The minus sign in the denominator ruled out the options of $\arctan$ and $\arccot$, leaving only (b) and (d) as possible answers. By taking the derivative and simplifying, it was confirmed that (b) was indeed the correct choice. The conversation ended with gratitude for the help and appreciation for the approach used in solving the problem.
  • #1
Lorena_Santoro
22
0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
partial fraction decomposition ... choice (b
 
  • #3
Let's see if it is an $\arctan$ or an $\arccot$.
We can rewrite:
$$\frac{3}{x^2+x-2}=\frac{3}{(x+\frac 12)^2-\frac 14-2}=\frac{3}{(x+\frac 12)^2-\frac 94}$$
The minus sign in the denominator implies that it is neither $\arctan$ nor $\arccot$.

So the only possible answers are (b) and (d).
Let's check (b) by taking its derivative:
$$\frac d{dx}\left(\ln\left|\frac{x-1}{x+2}\right|+c\right) = \frac d{dx}(\ln|x-1|-\ln|x+2|)=\frac 1{x-1}-\frac 1{x+2}=\frac{(x+2)-(x-1)}{(x-1)(x+2)}=\frac{3}{x^2+x-2}$$
We have a match. Therefore (b) is the correct answer.
 
  • #4
skeeter said:
partial fraction decomposition ... choice (b
Yes, thanks!
 
  • #5
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Let's see if it is an $\arctan$ or an $\arccot$.
We can rewrite:
$$\frac{3}{x^2+x-2}=\frac{3}{(x+\frac 12)^2-\frac 14-2}=\frac{3}{(x+\frac 12)^2-\frac 94}$$
The minus sign in the denominator implies that it is neither $\arctan$ nor $\arccot$.

So the only possible answers are (b) and (d).
Let's check (b) by taking its derivative:
$$\frac d{dx}\left(\ln\left|\frac{x-1}{x+2}\right|+c\right) = \frac d{dx}(\ln|x-1|-\ln|x+2|)=\frac 1{x-1}-\frac 1{x+2}=\frac{(x+2)-(x-1)}{(x-1)(x+2)}=\frac{3}{x^2+x-2}$$
We have a match. Therefore (b) is the correct answer.

Thanks so much, especially for your time. You are perfectly right. Also, I liked how it started by doing 3=2+1 and then adding and negating x for factorization.
 

FAQ: Is It an $\arctan$, $\arccot$, or Something Else in This Integral Solution?

How does the trick work?

The trick to solving an integral involves using a specific method or formula to simplify the integral into a more manageable form. This could include techniques such as substitution, integration by parts, or trigonometric identities.

Can the trick be applied to any integral?

The trick may not work for every integral, as some integrals may require more advanced techniques or may not have a closed form solution. However, the trick can be applied to a wide range of integrals and is a useful tool for solving many problems.

Is the trick a shortcut or does it provide a deeper understanding of integrals?

The trick is a useful tool for solving integrals, but it is important to also understand the underlying concepts and principles of integration. The trick can provide a shortcut for solving certain integrals, but a deeper understanding of integration is necessary for more complex problems.

Are there different tricks for solving different types of integrals?

Yes, there are various tricks and techniques that can be used for different types of integrals. For example, trigonometric integrals may require the use of trigonometric identities, while integrals involving logarithmic functions may require integration by parts.

How can I learn more about different tricks for solving integrals?

There are many resources available for learning about different tricks and techniques for solving integrals. You can consult textbooks, online tutorials, or seek guidance from a teacher or tutor. Practice and experimentation are also key in developing a better understanding of integration and its various tricks.

Similar threads

Back
Top