- #36
JT Smith
- 413
- 585
jbriggs444 said:I believe that such a replacement is an exact equivalence.
The amount of rain swept out by the forward facing half of the cylinder would be the same as for a cuboid of the same frontal cross-section.
I was thinking the same thing when I looked at that paper. So why did they do it? Perhaps it makes a small difference in the case of wind but I doubt that it matters much, if at all, in terms of the overall conclusions. Maybe someone not as lazy as me can verify this.