Is it possible, that one physics law is "Everything is in motion?"

In summary, there is no law that states "Everything is in motion." Zero does, in fact, exist in nature.
  • #1
andrecoelho
9
1
TL;DR Summary
everything in motion
Is it possible, that one physics law is "Everything is in motion?" (since zero doesnt belong to nature)...if so, does that implies that black holes move?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"zero" belongs in nature as much as any other number.

And, black holes certainly move : as well as evidence of galaxies (which commonly have huge BH's at their center) passing through each other, we've real-time observed black holes colliding.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #3
andrecoelho said:
TL;DR Summary: everything in motion

Is it possible, that one physics law is "Everything is in motion?" (since zero doesnt belong to nature)...if so, does that implies that black holes move?
Everything IS in motion. All motion is relative and everything is in motion relative to SOMETHING, but we hardly need a "law" to say that.

Also, what on Earth could you possibly mean by "zero doesn't belong to nature" ??? I am currently holding zero apples in my left hand.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and russ_watters
  • #4
you can't it doesnt exists...you arne't holding anything...for example, for apples or roses..zero of those two are equal...also because of infinity might be zero..for example the creation of the university
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Motore and PeroK
  • #5
andrecoelho said:
you can't it doesnt exists...you arne't holding anything...for example, for apples or roses..zero of those two are equal...also because of infinity might be zero..for example the creation of the university
This is just word salad as far as I can tell. Or, put another way:
bunny.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, russ_watters, Bystander and 2 others
  • #6
andrecoelho said:
you can't it doesnt exists...
True, in the limited sense of the natural numbers, which you did not specify in your original post, which had to do with motion, which measurement rarely approximates a natural number.
 
  • #7
hmmm27 said:
True, in the limited sense of the natural numbers, which you did not specity in your original post.
ooops forgot :)
 
  • #8
andrecoelho said:
you can't it doesnt exists...you arne't holding anything...for example, for apples or roses..zero of those two are equal...also because of infinity might be zero..for example the creation of the university
You need to learn some physics. This is just rambling, ungrammatical nonsense.

Zero is an eigenvalue of the quantum angular momentum operator, hence a valid measurement of angular momentum. Zero does, therefore, exist in nature - in this and many other contexts.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and russ_watters
  • #9
PeroK said:
You need to learn some physics. This is just rambling, ungrammatical nonsense.

Zero is an eigenvalue of the quantum angular momentum operator, hence a valid measurement of angular momentum. Zero does, therefore, exist in nature - in this and many other contexts.
Ok.... but since everything moves, (i checked wikipedia), then everything is subject to a force , and applying a force?
thanks....
 
  • #10
andrecoelho said:
Ok.... but since everything moves, (i checked wikipedia), then everything is subject to a force , and applying a force?
thanks....
GADS! NO! You really need to learn some VERY basic physics. Maybe start with Newton's Laws at least.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, Vanadium 50, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #11
andrecoelho said:
... because of infinity might be zero..for example the creation of the university
I know our academic institutions have come under fire, but ...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes nasu, dextercioby, malawi_glenn and 3 others
  • #12
andrecoelho said:
you can't it doesnt exists...you arne't holding anything...for example, for apples or roses..zero of those two are equal...also because of infinity might be zero..for example the creation of the university
PF Medic here, stopping the bleeding. Thanks all for trying to help the newbie.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Vanadium 50, russ_watters, jbriggs444 and 2 others

FAQ: Is it possible, that one physics law is "Everything is in motion?"

Is "Everything is in motion" a recognized law in physics?

No, "Everything is in motion" is not a recognized law in physics. While it is true that many objects and particles in the universe are in motion, this statement is more of a general observation rather than a formal law. Established laws like Newton's Laws of Motion and Einstein's Theory of Relativity provide a more precise framework for understanding motion.

How does the concept of "Everything is in motion" relate to existing physical laws?

The concept that everything is in motion aligns with several physical principles, such as Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force. Additionally, in quantum mechanics, particles exhibit wave-like properties and are never completely at rest. However, this concept alone is too broad to be considered a standalone law.

Can the idea that "Everything is in motion" be applied universally?

While the idea can be applied broadly, it is not universally applicable in a strict scientific sense. For example, in a theoretical absolute zero temperature scenario, particles would be at their lowest energy state, displaying minimal motion. Therefore, while motion is a prevalent aspect of the universe, it is not an absolute condition.

What are the implications of "Everything is in motion" for our understanding of the universe?

Understanding that most things are in motion helps us grasp the dynamic nature of the universe. It influences our comprehension of phenomena such as planetary orbits, atomic particle behavior, and the expansion of the universe. This perspective is crucial for fields like astrophysics, quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics.

Is there a scientific basis for the statement "Everything is in motion"?

Yes, there is a scientific basis, but it is rooted in various established theories and observations rather than a single law. For instance, the kinetic theory of gases explains the motion of particles in a gas, and General Relativity describes the motion of objects in spacetime. These theories collectively support the observation that motion is a fundamental characteristic of the universe.

Similar threads

Back
Top