- #1
elcaro
- 128
- 30
- TL;DR Summary
- Video lecture by Paul Steinhard, one of cofounders of the theory of cosmological inflation, who now works on an alternative cosmological model, namely cycling universe. In this lecture he compares a slow contracting cosmological model to an inflationary model, and discusses the effects this has on the overall flatness of the universe.
Paul Steinhardt: Time to Take the ‘Big Bang’ out of the Big Bang Theory?
Paul Steinhard, who co-founded inflationary cosmology, is working on alternatives for inflation in the form of a cyclic, bouncing universe model. In this lecture he compares his model with the inflationary model, and argues that a slow contracting universe would better explain the flatness of the universe as inflation can.
What do you think of a cyclic model versus inflationary model, has a cyclic universe more explenatory power and does it fit better with the cosmological data as inflation?
For some more background on this cyclic cosmological model, I add some more videos on this and a scietific paper:
Paul Steinhardt and the New Big Bounce Cosmology
Paul Steinhardt: Introduction to Bouncing Cosmology
Link to the paper:
A Cyclic Model of the Universe
PS. I am not an advocate for a cyclic universe (or any other) model, and I guess ultimately precission meausurements can decide what model best fits the data. As for any scientific theory.
Last edited: