Is $k \geq 3$ enough to conclude $(k - 1)^2 > 2$ in mathematical induction?

In summary: If $a,b > 0$, and $a^2 \geq b^2$, then it must be that $a \geq b$, for if we had:$a < b$, then $a^2 < ab < b^2$, contradiction.If we could show $(k - 1)^2 \geq 4$, it would surely be greater than 2, since $4 > 2$.Now 4 has the advantage of being a perfect square, so from the argument above, it would be sufficient if we have:$k - 1 \geq 2$.So, if $k
  • #1
ineedhelpnow
651
0
Did i do this right?

$2^n>n^2$, $n \ge 5$

$S_{k+1}: 2^{k+1}>k^2+2k+1$

$2^k>k^2$

$2(2^k)>2k^2$

$2^{k+1}>k^2+k^2$

And $k^2+k^2>k^2+2k+1$

RHS: $k^2+2k+1$

So $2^{k+1}>(k+1)^2$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ineedhelpnow said:
Did i do this right?

$2^n>n^2$, $n \ge 5$

$S_{k+1}: 2^{k+1}>k^2+2k+1$

$2^k>k^2$

$2(2^k)>2k^2$

$2^{k+1}>k^2+k^2$

And $k^2+k^2>k^2+2k+1$

RHS: $k^2+2k+1$

So $2^{k+1}>(k+1)^2$

the steps are right but you need to show that
$k^2\gt 2k+ 1$
which is true for k >4(as you need for k > 4)
as $k^2\gt 4k \gt 2k +1$

then the proof becomes compelte
 
  • #3
And you need to show the base case, i.e. show it holds for $n = 5$ (easy, but you must not forget it, otherwise the proof is useless).
 
  • #4
kaliprasad said:
the steps are right but you need to show that
$k^2\gt 2k+ 1$
which is true for k >4(as you need for k > 4)
as $k^2\gt 4k \gt 2k +1$

then the proof becomes compelte
how do i show that though? do i just state it or do i have to prove it?
 
  • #5
You have to prove it, of course, like kaliprasad did.
 
  • #6
how would i prove that though? do because i mentioned in my notes that $k^2>2k+1$ but i don't know how to prove it.
 
  • #7
ineedhelpnow said:
how would i prove that though? do because i mentioned in my notes that $k^2>2k+1$ but i don't know how to prove it.

Try adding $1-2k$ to both sides...then you can find a lower bound for the positive real numbers.
 
  • #8
if you add that to both sides you end up getting $k^2-2k+1>0$
 
  • #9
ineedhelpnow said:
if you add that to both sides you end up getting $k^2-2k+1>0$

Well, you actually get:

\(\displaystyle k^2-2k+1>2\)

Now, factor the left side, and concern yourself only with \(\displaystyle 0<k\)...
 
  • #10
oh yes your right.

$(k-1)^2>2$
 
  • #11
ineedhelpnow said:
oh yes your right.

$(k-1)^2>2$

So, what is the lower bound for positive $k$?
 
  • #12
2?
 
  • #13
ineedhelpnow said:
2?

I really should have said concern yourself with \(\displaystyle 1\le k\) where \(\displaystyle k\in\mathbb{N}\)

Take the positive root of both sides...what do you find?
 
  • #14
Suppose we want to be able to CONCLUDE:

$(k - 1)^2 > 2$

What conditions does $k$ have to satisfy, first?

Note that if $a,b > 0$ and $a^2 \geq b^2$, then it must be that $a \geq b$, for if we had:

$a < b$, then $a^2 < ab < b^2$, contradiction.

If we could show $(k - 1)^2 \geq 4$, it would surely be greater than 2, since $4 > 2$.

Now 4 has the advantage of being a perfect square, so from the argument above, it would be sufficient if we have:

$k - 1 \geq 2$.

Almost there...can you finish?
 

FAQ: Is $k \geq 3$ enough to conclude $(k - 1)^2 > 2$ in mathematical induction?

What is mathematical induction?

Mathematical induction is a proof method used to show that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It involves two steps: the base case, where the statement is shown to be true for the first natural number, and the inductive step, where it is shown that if the statement is true for one natural number, it is also true for the next natural number.

Why is mathematical induction important?

Mathematical induction is important because it is a fundamental proof technique used in mathematics and computer science. It allows us to prove statements that hold for infinitely many numbers, without having to check each individual case.

What is the difference between strong and weak induction?

In strong induction, the inductive step assumes that the statement is true for all previous natural numbers, while in weak induction, the inductive step only assumes that the statement is true for the previous natural number. This means that strong induction is a more powerful technique, but it is not always necessary to use it.

What are some common mistakes when using mathematical induction?

One common mistake is assuming that the statement is true for all natural numbers without first proving the base case. Another mistake is using the wrong variable in the inductive step, which can lead to an incorrect proof. It is also important to make sure that the inductive step is logically sound and follows from the assumption that the statement is true for the previous natural number.

Can mathematical induction be used to prove statements about real numbers?

No, mathematical induction can only be used to prove statements about natural numbers. This is because the inductive step relies on the fact that the next natural number exists, which is not true for real numbers. However, mathematical induction can be used to prove statements about integers, as they are also a subset of natural numbers.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
959
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top