Is Lim x->0 tan x / x Correct?

  • Thread starter anderma8
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Tan
In summary, the conversation revolves around the limit of sec²(x) as x approaches 0, with various methods being proposed and discussed. The conclusion is reached that the limit is 1, with the help of the formula tan(x)/x = sin(x)/x = 1 and the knowledge of cos(0) = 1. The concept of Taylor Series is also mentioned as a helpful tool in understanding limits.
  • #1
anderma8
35
0
I've done this problem but am not comfortable with the answer. Could someone take a quick look?

Limx->0 tan x /x

Limx->0 sec^2x ==> 0

I'm just not sure this is right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sec(x)=1/cos(x)

So how do you conclude that the limit of sec²(x) is 0 ?
 
  • #3
ok, so could I use sec^2(x) = 1/cos^2(x) then use the power reducing formula to make: limx->0 2/(1+cos2x)? Then as x->0, then the value would be 2/1 thus 2?
 
  • #4
Do you think that cos(0)=0 ? That's sin's job.
 
  • #5
ahhh cos(0) = 1 and sin(0) = 0. I should have verified that b4... Given this, then 2/(1+cos2(0)) = 2/2 = 1. Knowing this, there are 2 things that I should have worked through: secx = 1/cosx and that cos(0) = 1.

Thanks very much for your help!
 
  • #6
or just recall that sin/cos = tan and cos(0)= 1, so tan(x)/x has the same limit as sin(x)/x which everyone knows is 1.

but still everything relies on knowing cos(0) =1.
 
  • #7
Thank you! I'm not quite sure I understand, but I get tan = sin/cos since tye hypenuses cancel but how can I prove tan(x)/x has the same limit as sin(x)/x? I need to read and understand some of the finer points, or I won't be able to answer some fundamental questions. Any suggestions as to where to start? I'm going to google it and try and find something. Having been away from this stuff for a very long time, it's tough to come back...

Thanks for your info!
 
  • #8
The keys to mathwonk's argument is that

[tex]\frac{\tan(x)}{x}=\frac{1}{\cos(x)}\frac{\sin(x)}{x}[/tex]

, that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(x)}{x}=1[/tex]

, and that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a}f(x)g(x)=\lim_{x\rightarrow a}f(x)\cdot \lim_{x\rightarrow a}g(x)[/tex]

(provided the last two limits exist).
 
  • #9
Have you learned Taylor Series yet? Since this is the limit as x goes to zero, the first term of tan x's taylor series Could have been substituted in and The limit would have been easy to see.
 
  • #10
I understand the first part since (opp/hyp)/(adj/hyp) thus opp/adj = tan. That part makes sense. I don't get sin(x)/x = 1. Is this just something I should accept? I understand sin^2+cos^2=1. Would that be part of it? As for the last part, that makes sense provided they both approach the limit from the same side.

I found some articles on the web that sort of explain things, but I suspect that I'm going to have to read them a few times to really understand it!

Thanks for your help!
 
  • #11
Gib Z said:
Have you learned Taylor Series yet? Since this is the limit as x goes to zero, the first term of tan x's taylor series Could have been substituted in and The limit would have been easy to see.

No, we have not reviewed Taylor Series yet. We have just started that section. Might there be an area in which I could review and get a jump on what to expect?

THANKS!
 
  • #12
I understand the first part since (opp/hyp)/(adj/hyp) thus opp/adj = tan. That part makes sense.[\QUOTE]

No it doesn't. I know I am being pedantic, but you really need an argument. tan of what? 5 bananas?

I don't get sin(x)/x = 1. Is this just something I should accept?
[\QUOTE] NO. Because that's not true for all values of x. What they were talking about is [itex]\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} =1[/itex]
I understand sin^2+cos^2=1. [\QUOTE]
Good

anderma8 said:
Thanks for your help!
Your Welcome.Just search Taylor Series In Google and Wikipedia.
 
  • #13
Quotes thing doesn't seem to want to work for me, But you get the point.
 
  • #14
I do get ur point: tan x = opp/adj :smile:

As for point 2: limx->0 sin(x)/x = 1 vs. sin(x)/x = 1 ARE 2 different statements. Good point and I need to keep this in mind since they say very different things.

I'll search now in google for 'Taylor Series'. IK Wikipedia has also been a source of good info for me too!

Thanks!
 
  • #15
anderma8 said:
I don't get sin(x)/x = 1. Is this just something I should accept?

Here is a proof: http://people.hofstra.edu/faculty/Stefan_Waner/trig/triglim.html

If the inequality arguments are a little over your head, just remember the result because it's very useful. And come back to the proof to get your revenge when you've become stronger.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Is Lim x->0 tan x / x Correct?

What is L'Hopital's rule?

L'Hopital's rule is a mathematical technique used to evaluate limits involving indeterminate forms, such as 0/0 or ∞/∞. It states that if the limit of f(x) / g(x) as x approaches a certain value is indeterminate, then the limit of the ratio of the derivatives of f(x) and g(x) as x approaches the same value will be the same as the original limit.

What is the indeterminate form of tan x / x as x approaches 0?

The indeterminate form of tan x / x as x approaches 0 is 0/0. This means that the limit cannot be evaluated using basic algebraic methods and requires the use of L'Hopital's rule.

How do you apply L'Hopital's rule to solve the limit of tan x / x as x approaches 0?

To apply L'Hopital's rule, take the derivative of both the numerator and denominator of the fraction separately. This will result in a new fraction with a simpler form. Then, evaluate the limit of this new fraction. If the limit is still indeterminate, repeat the process until the limit can be evaluated. In the case of tan x / x, after taking the derivatives, the limit becomes sin x / 1, which evaluates to 0 as x approaches 0. Therefore, the original limit is also 0.

Why is L'Hopital's rule useful for evaluating limits?

L'Hopital's rule is useful because it provides a method for evaluating limits that cannot be solved using basic algebraic techniques. It allows for the evaluation of indeterminate forms, which are often encountered in calculus and other areas of mathematics.

Are there any limitations to using L'Hopital's rule?

Yes, there are limitations to using L'Hopital's rule. It can only be used when the original limit is in an indeterminate form, and it may not always result in a solution. Additionally, it may be difficult to determine when to stop applying L'Hopital's rule, as repeated applications may lead to a more complex expression instead of a simpler one.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
559
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top