MHB Is Marginalization Always Valid for Joint Probabilities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equation $$P(B \land C) = P(B \land C | A) P(A) + P(B \land C | \lnot A) P( \lnot A)$$ using principles from set theory and probability. It is established that since events A and not A are mutually exclusive, the sum rule applies, leading to the conclusion that the probabilities can be separated into their respective conditional probabilities. The proof utilizes the general product rule to confirm that the equation holds true regardless of the value of $$P(A)$$. Thus, the relationship between joint probabilities and conditional probabilities is validated. This confirms that marginalization in this context is always valid.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Given $$P(B \land C)$$ will it always be true that $$P(B \land C | A) P(A) + P(B \land C | \lnot A) P( \lnot A)$$ (regardless what $P(A)$ would be)?

How can I prove this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
Given $$P(B \land C)$$ will it always be true that $$P(B \land C | A) P(A) + P(B \land C | \lnot A) P( \lnot A)$$ (regardless what $P(A)$ would be)?

How can I prove this?

Hi tmt, (Smile)

We have from set theory:
$$P(B \land C) = P(B \land C \land (A \lor \lnot A))
= P((B \land C \land A) \lor (B \land C \land \lnot A))
$$
Since $A$ and $\lnot A$ are mutually exclusive, as are subsets of them, it follows from the sum rule that:
$$P((B \land C \land A) \lor (B \land C \land \lnot A)) = P(B \land C \land A) + P(B \land C \land \lnot A)
$$
Then, from the general product rule, it follows that:
$$ P(B \land C \land A) + P(B \land C \land \lnot A) = P(B \land C \mid A)P(A) + P(B \land C \mid \lnot A)P(\lnot A)
$$
So indeed, without knowing anything about $P(A)$, we can state that:
$$P(B \land C) = P(B \land C \mid A)P(A) + P(B \land C \mid \lnot A)P(\lnot A)$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top