- #1
ermina_h
even in this time, when nothing really shocks us, we see more and more artists, who give the name "art" to abstract pieces, in which i (personally) can t see any meaning. i attended an exhibition and for example, there was a video, that showed a man throwing up. i don t know.. i am not conservative and i like innovation in art (even if artists provoke, like gilbert and george), but doesn t art have any limits?! i mean, is everyone who doesn t have any idea about art, able to create something easy and draft and at last give it the name "modern art"?!
in former years, where anti-art was really innovative, provokative and meaningful, this special kind of art was reaching its goal.
but what is the meaning of "trying" to shock now, when no one is really shocked?
in former years, where anti-art was really innovative, provokative and meaningful, this special kind of art was reaching its goal.
but what is the meaning of "trying" to shock now, when no one is really shocked?