Is My Mathematical Discovery Truly Original?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enkrypt0r
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual's exploration of mathematical concepts, leading to the formulation of a theorem regarding the least common multiple (LCM) of two numbers. The proposed statement claims that if the absolute difference between two numbers is one, then their LCM equals their product. However, it is pointed out that this result is not original, as it applies to consecutive integers where the greatest common divisor is one. The participant is encouraged to continue their mathematical explorations, as there may still be new discoveries ahead. Engaging with foundational concepts can lead to deeper insights in mathematics.
enkrypt0r
10
0
Well, last summer I had a lot of time on my hands, and I would stay up late just randomly playing with math and numbers to kill time. After playing around with them long enough, I seem to have come up with a theorem/axiom/postulate (I don't know the terminology). I never really thought that I had come up with anything new until I had a look at my notebook today, and started Googling. Perhaps I wasn't trying the right keywords, but I can't find anything like this online. Now that I think about it, I seem to remember writing a program to prove this true, and it ended up working. I've since reformatted that computer (installed my mom's new OS).

Anyways, it's not really a big deal or anything, and I doubt it's really useful, but:"If the absolute value of a minus b is equal to one, then the least common multiple of a and b is equal to ab."

or

If |a-b| = 1 Then LCM(a,b) = abI'm sure something like this is already in existence, but I can't seem to find it... Can anybody else?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid what you've come up with isn't new-- your statement says that the least common multiple of two consecutive integers is their product. You can see this by looking at the formula for the least common multiple of two numbers lcm(a,b)=\frac{ab}{gcd(a,b)}. Since a and b are consecutive, gcd(a,b)=1, which yields the result.

Still, carry on playing around on your notebook and one day you'll discover something new!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
133
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top