Is our perception of reality frequency based?

In summary, The conversation discusses the concept of reality being perceived through a specific frequency, similar to a radio spectrum. The idea is that if we could change this frequency, we could potentially access alternative realities. Suggestions for further reading on this concept are also given.
  • #1
drakenw
I found this site via a google search for some key terms I was thinking about. Let me preface by saying I have never taken a physics class, and I am definitely no genius.

I formerly was an intelligence analyst in the military working with electronic signals, the concept that I'm now pondering only came to me within the past few years though.

What if our perception of reality is due to our minds being tuned into a specific frequency, and along with that all other minds, and objects are "tuned" into this frequency. I think of the universe kind of like a radio spectrum, withour minds being tuned into a specific channel. We can only perceive what we are tuned into. Therefore, if we're to think that everything that can happen, does happen at some point in time - could these alternative realities exist at even the most minute difference of frequency? If we were able to change the frequency of reality we perceive, would our world be different and if so, would we have any memories of the our previous perceptions? Do we naturally go in between different frequencies throughout the course of our lives? If there is any merit to this line of thinking, how could it be proved? By locating a resonate frequency of the universe perhaps? It couldn't a relative frequency emitted by all people, because as I see it - we are "listening" to the frequency, not necessarily transmitting. Perhaps these are just crazy thoughts, figured I would share though. Hopefully I've come to the right place.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
myself, i think thoughts are not electromagnetic in nature. Einstein's dad had an electromagnet factory so he was imprinted early-on to ponder that mysterious force and his thoughts set the tone for whole 20th century..

Brain is an electrochemical computer.

you might enjoy Carl Jung's book "Synchronicity" , and the Jung-Pauli letters on that subject. Just search on their names.

old jim
 
  • #3
jim hardy said:
myself, i think thoughts are not electromagnetic in nature. Einstein's dad had an electromagnet factory so he was imprinted early-on to ponder that mysterious force and his thoughts set the tone for whole 20th century..

Brain is an electrochemical computer.

you might enjoy Carl Jung's book "Synchronicity" , and the Jung-Pauli letters on that subject. Just search on their names.

old jim

Thanks for the suggestions, I'll definitely seek them out.

I definitely can agree with your idea of the brain, which leads me to think there may be biological frequencies; for lack of a better term.
 
  • #4
Welcome to Physics Forums!

It would be beneficial to read the overall PF rules, by clicking the Rules link at the top of any page here (in particular the Scientific Discussion Guidelines), as well the rules for this particular forum (Skepticism & Debunking), which are in the very first thread at the top of the forum, titled "New rules and guidelines..."
 
  • #5


I find this concept of reality being frequency-based to be intriguing and thought-provoking. While I cannot definitively say whether or not our perception of reality is indeed frequency-based, there are certainly some interesting ideas to consider.

Firstly, it is important to note that frequency is a fundamental aspect of our physical world. Everything, from the smallest particles to the largest galaxies, has a frequency associated with it. Our brains also operate on electrical impulses that can be measured in terms of frequency. So, in a sense, our perception of reality is already tied to frequency.

However, the idea that our minds and objects are all tuned into a specific frequency is a bit more complex. It suggests that there is a specific frequency that governs all of reality, and that our minds are attuned to it in order to perceive the world around us. While this is a fascinating concept, it is difficult to prove or disprove. It is also important to note that our perception of reality is influenced by a variety of factors, including our senses, past experiences, and cultural beliefs.

The idea of alternate realities existing at different frequencies is also intriguing. It raises questions about the possibility of parallel universes and the idea that there could be an infinite number of realities existing simultaneously. However, this is still a theoretical concept and has not been proven.

In terms of changing the frequency of reality, it is important to consider that our perception of reality is not solely based on frequency. As mentioned before, there are many other factors at play. Additionally, changing the frequency of reality would likely have significant consequences and could potentially alter our entire existence.

Lastly, the idea of proving this concept is a challenging one. It would require a deep understanding of the nature of reality and the ability to measure and manipulate frequencies in a way that is currently beyond our capabilities. However, the pursuit of knowledge and understanding is a crucial aspect of science, and it is always worth exploring new ideas and concepts.

In conclusion, while the concept of reality being frequency-based is intriguing, it is still a theoretical idea that requires further exploration and evidence. I encourage you to continue pondering and questioning, as this is how new discoveries and understandings are made. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and ideas.
 

FAQ: Is our perception of reality frequency based?

What is frequency-based perception of reality?

The frequency-based perception of reality is a theory that suggests our perception of the world is dependent on the frequency at which our brain processes incoming sensory information.

How does frequency-based perception differ from other theories of perception?

Unlike other theories that focus on the physical properties of stimuli, frequency-based perception considers the role of neural oscillations and synchrony in shaping our perception of reality.

Is there scientific evidence to support the frequency-based perception theory?

While the theory is still being studied and debated, there is evidence from neurophysiological studies that support the idea that our perception is influenced by the frequency of neuronal activity in the brain.

Can frequency-based perception explain individual differences in perception?

Yes, it is believed that differences in neural oscillations and synchrony may contribute to variations in perception among individuals. Additionally, factors such as age and cognitive abilities may also impact frequency-based perception.

How does frequency-based perception relate to our understanding of reality?

The theory suggests that our perception of reality is not a direct representation of the external world, but rather a construction based on the frequency at which our brain processes sensory information. This challenges the traditional idea of a single, objective reality and highlights the role of our brain in shaping our perception of the world.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
36
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
931
Back
Top