Is PETA's use of slavery as a comparison for animal suffering appropriate?

[loseyourname]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050913/ap_on_re_us/peta_campaign

PETA came under fire after a man began yelling that the exhibit was racist during an Aug. 8 showing in New Haven, Conn. National civil rights groups said the comparison demeaned blacks.

PETA, based in Norfolk, apologized earlier this year for a campaign comparing the suffering of Holocaust victims with that of factory animals. That campaign ran from February 2003 to October 2004.

Yeah, I know, another PETA thread. Whatever.

 

[devil-fire]

if members of peta valued animal lives more then human ones, i would think 'well that's what they believe' and wouldn't have bitter thoughts in my mind of peta when they offend others with such a display. i have never heard of peta martyrs demonstrating this fact. they are implying that animal life is as valuable as human life with the intent of inspiring compassion for animals, but they are just doing what they can to achieve their goals, even if means being insincere

 

[kerimek]

I believe it is important for organizations to use accurate and appropriate comparisons in order to effectively convey their message. In this case, PETA's decision to resume their slavery display raises concerns about the validity and sensitivity of their approach.

While I understand the intent behind PETA's use of slavery as a comparison to the treatment of animals, it is not a scientifically valid comparison. Slavery was a horrific and complex system of human oppression, while the treatment of animals in factory farms and other industries is a separate issue that also deserves attention and action.

Furthermore, using slavery as a comparison can be seen as trivializing and demeaning to the experiences of those who were enslaved. This can be particularly hurtful to communities of color who have a history of being oppressed and marginalized.

PETA's previous campaign comparing the suffering of Holocaust victims to that of factory animals was also met with criticism and rightfully so. The suffering of animals, while important, cannot be equated to the atrocities committed during the Holocaust.

As scientists, it is our responsibility to use accurate and evidence-based language and comparisons in order to effectively communicate our message. In this case, PETA's decision to resume their slavery display undermines their credibility and detracts from the important issue of animal welfare. I urge PETA to reconsider their approach and work towards finding more appropriate and effective ways to advocate for animal rights.