Is RateMyProfessors a Reliable Source for Evaluating Professors?

[JSBeckton]

There was a story on the BBC last night about trying to ban sites like this (and kids posting stuff about teachers on youtube).

Spot on, imo.

link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6539989.stm

So much for freedom of speech...

Next they should ban mesage boards that talk about banning websites.

Society needs one hell of a slap in the face for all of this babying everyone. What do you end up with, a bunch of babies that want to ban everything offensive. Life is not always warm and fuzzy, DEAL WITH IT!

If a website makes you want to cry, you should not be teaching anyone anything IOM. You should be in therepy to recover from a sheltered life that has left you weak and vulnerable in a world that is tough and gritty.

 

[starchild75]

Banning websites is a slippery slope. Who would decide which websites to ban, and why? Probably George W. Busche. Imagine that. How quickly the masses would be manipulated. Next, the only talkshows we would be able to watch would be hosted by Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter!

 

[Yowhatsupt]

1st off when I see the comment the tests looked nothing like what we did in class, I'm wary. It's pretty unreasonable to think that a prof is going to test you on material he hasn't covered.

2nd. off Tests are only hard when you don't know the material as you should. If this is the case then you are to blame not the prof. As we established in 1 that he probably did teach it to you.

3rd. The only thing i would look for on those sites is if they talk about the way prof's grade. If the prof is nitpicky about format etc and takes off points for it then that is someone i would avoid like the plague. Id also avoid anyone who taught you how to do it but didn't explain what it was you were doing.

 

[AsianSensationK]

There still are plenty of good facts you can glean about a professor from the website.

I had a prof for differential equations who didn't have the slightest clue how to structure notes so a student could understand what he was talking about. No labels for the problems. No labeling of topics. Atrocious handwriting. Kind of makes it tough to go back over the notes when studying. Even worse, his exams were all multiple choice scantron, with no possibility of partial credit. All of the student reviews on this site state exactly these facts.

Had I used this website before hand, I would've avoided the class and taken a different one. Instead, I wound up having to late drop and take it during a different term because his class made no sense.

 

[mathwonk]

on the other hand, maybe you could learn to deal with a class like that to your benefit. note taking is a skill.

I used to prefer courses from loomis because his handwriting was beautiful and he wrote clearly and slowly, and his notes were well organized.

but eventually, much later, i realized he was not presenting anything very challenging or valuable.

I would have been better off with sternberg, whose lectures were less organized but more insightful.

but it was not until i began to understand something that i rrealized this.

also it was when i stopped treating a class as something to get a good grade in, and began treating it as something to learn from.

 

[matt grime]

Ah, student evaluations. Here are some I had from students in the same class:

1. Has terrible chicken-scratchy writing (ironically this form was filled in in barely legible handwriting)
2. His presentation is very clear, especially his hand writing.
3. This guy's english is terrible.
4. Thank god we've got a native english speaker for a change.
5. obviously doesn't know any of the material.
6. clearly knows his stuff.
7, he just recited the textbook
8, he didn't pay any attention to the textbook

I imagine a fair summary of my teaching (2nd year multivarible calc in the states was the above examepl) is:

Seems to have no time for the textbook for the course, and doesn't set homework from it. Homework assigments are harder than I was expecting*. Doesn't suffer slow students gladly, and makes you spend time learning the material independently. Offers office hours whenever the student wants** and never turns a student away.

*[I actually checked what I could assume they knew and set questions accordingly - even my marker for the cours couldn't do some of them, depressingly]

** [students only attended them in the week before the test, so I got fed up with waiting in my office and made them appointment only]

I can imagine that any evaluations weren't anything like that.

I think most teachers know their own shortcomings (I have zero patience, for instance with people not prepared to think for themselves). I don't think students really appreciate what are shortcomings and what is them having unreasonable expectations. I even had one student demand I give him an A 'cos he got As in every other class. Tough.

Howabout a rejoinder website? Rateyourstudent.com, where teachers are allowed to post (suitably obsured) homework attempts and test answers offered by students?

Although I didn't set the exams for the courses I taught recently (in the UK), I did point out to all my students that if they simply did all the past exam papers on the subjects they will spot that the questions in alternate years are nearly identical (and on the homework sheets), and that there was no reason not to get almost 100%. I don't think more than a handful can have paid any attention to this advice.

 

[Stephan Hoyer]

matt (and others) - you may be interested in rateyourstudents.blogspot.com. It's really entertaining.

 

[matt grime]

I guess it goes to show that it's as hard to have original ideas in the internet innovation world as in the maths world... That site makes me smile.