Is Refusing All Medical Care A Rational Choice For End-Of-Life Planning?

  • Thread starter Slask
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rational
In summary, the individual is not suicidal but is in their 70s and trying to make plans and policies for end of life while still healthy. They wear a Medic Alert ID Tag that says "Refuse all Medical Care" and is seeking validation for their reasoning from others. They have concerns about becoming an invalid or suffering a lingering death, and believe that their hope for a swift death could be transformed into their worst nightmare by receiving medical treatment. They also mention considering the tag as an enhanced DNR order. They have three questions about the validity of their logic, state laws regarding first responders respecting their request, and if there is a better way to manage this risk other than the Medic Alert ID tag. The individual has not discussed this with
  • #1
Slask
I am not suicidal. But I am in my 70s and I am trying to make plans and policies appropriate for my age, dealing with end of life. I'm doing this while I'm still healthy.

I wear a Medic Alert ID Tag that says "Refuse all Medical Care" PF is visited by civil intelligent people so I would like some validation of my reasoning.

I live an active and very happy life style, even at my advanced age. My worst nightmare is that I will become an invalid (or worse) and suffer a lingering death. I believe that is a mainstream hope that nearly everyone shares. Most medical events are out of my control. I may be lucky and have a swift death, or not.

However, I think of the possibility of an accident. I use the metaphor of being run over by a bus. If that happens to me, and if my injuries are so severe that I can not communicate with the first responders, then I believe that the probability of death is high if I receive no treatment. I also believe that the probability of becoming an invalid if I survive with treatment is very high. In other words, if I do get run over by a bus, my hope for a swift death is nearly achieved, but it could be transformed into my worst nightmare by a hospital. Hence, the "Refuse All Medical Care" tag.

On the other hand, if I get run over by a bus, but I am able to communicate with first responders, then I can ignore the tag and make up my mind whether or not I want treatment.

In other words, I consider that tag to be an enhanced DNR (do not resuscitate) order,

I have three questions:
  1. Is my logic valid?
  2. Do state laws allow first responders to respect my request and to leave me to die on the side of the road?(When I sat it that way, I suspect that the answer is no.)
  3. Is there a better way to manage this risk other than a Medic Alert ID tag?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Slask said:
I am not suicidal. But I am in my 70s and I am trying to make plans and policies appropriate for my age, dealing with end of life. I'm doing this while I'm still healthy.

I wear a Medic Alert ID Tag that says "Refuse all Medical Care" PF is visited by civil intelligent people so I would like some validation of my reasoning.

I live an active and very happy life style, even at my advanced age. My worst nightmare is that I will become an invalid (or worse) and suffer a lingering death. I believe that is a mainstream hope that nearly everyone shares. Most medical events are out of my control. I may be lucky and have a swift death, or not.

However, I think of the possibility of an accident. I use the metaphor of being run over by a bus. If that happens to me, and if my injuries are so severe that I can not communicate with the first responders, then I believe that the probability of death is high if I receive no treatment. I also believe that the probability of becoming an invalid if I survive with treatment is very high. In other words, if I do get run over by a bus, my hope for a swift death is nearly achieved, but it could be transformed into my worst nightmare by a hospital. Hence, the "Refuse All Medical Care" tag.

On the other hand, if I get run over by a bus, but I am able to communicate with first responders, then I can ignore the tag and make up my mind whether or not I want treatment.

In other words, I consider that tag to be an enhanced DNR (do not resuscitate) order,

I have three questions:
  1. Is my logic valid?
  2. Do state laws allow first responders to respect my request and to leave me to die on the side of the road?(When I sat it that way, I suspect that the answer is no.)
  3. Is there a better way to manage this risk other than a Medic Alert ID tag?

Welcome to the PF.

Have you discussed this with your doctor? Where did you get the bracelet?

DNR rules and laws vary by state and county, so it's important for you to discuss the options with your doctor, and get any necessary forms signed by your doctor.
 
  • #3
It is my understanding that a valid legal DNR document (Living Will) must exist to support any other evidence as a bracelet or tattoo that resuscitation is not to be performed. If you go into cardiac arrest, or you are unconscious and bleeding profusely, both of which if treated would return you to your previous lifestyle would you still not wish to be saved? Also if you have a stroke which leaves you in a coma, you seem to fear, your bracelet will not help. Thus you should entrust the medical intervention decision to someone that will respect your wishes by having a legal Living Will drawn up. I don't think EMT's are there to to make any decisions except how to keep you alive until a physician can evaluate you.

I share your concern but the DNR request only makes sense to me after a physician has evaluated your condition and determines that further medical intervention is not beneficial.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #4
berkeman said:
Have you discussed this with your doctor? Where did you get the bracelet?

DNR rules and laws vary by state and county, so it's important for you to discuss the options with your doctor, and get any necessary forms signed by your doctor.
gleem said:
I share your concern but the DNR request only makes sense to me after a physician has evaluated your condition and determines that further medical intervention is not beneficial.
Thank you for your replies. I'm extremely jealous over my exclusive authority to manage my own life. I am not willing to share that authority with anyone, not even doctors.

gleem touched the heart of the problem. I retain the sole exclusive right to judge what is "beneficial" regarding my own life. That should not be controversial considering that doctors have a financial interest in providing more treatment. They are never neutral parties.

gleem said:
Also if you have a stroke which leaves you in a coma, you seem to fear, your bracelet will not help. Thus you should entrust the medical intervention decision to someone that will respect your wishes by having a legal Living Will drawn up.

I must admit gleem your logic seems sound, and it challenges my logic. Thank you.
 
  • #5
Slask said:
Thank you for your replies. I'm extremely jealous over my exclusive authority to manage my own life. I am not willing to share that authority with anyone, not even doctors.

Well, you still need a doctor to sign your DNR, or it is not legal in most places that I'm familiar with. In the county where I'm licensed as an EMT, you need the form completed before you can get the legally-recongized medallion or bracelet. If you don't have the form with you or the legally-recognized medallion, you will be treated and resuscitated, period.

You absolutely as a responsible adult get to make these decisions, but you need to get the legal stuff right if you really want to make sure that the DNR is binding.
 
  • #6
berkeman said:
Well, you still need a doctor to sign your DNR, or it is not legal in most places that I'm familiar with. In the county where I'm licensed as an EMT, you need the form completed before you can get the legally-recongized medallion or bracelet. If you don't have the form with you or the legally-recognized medallion, you will be treated and resuscitated, period.

You absolutely as a responsible adult get to make these decisions, but you need to get the legal stuff right if you really want to make sure that the DNR is binding.
I'll say it another way: it is unfair to put anyone but a doctor in a position to make/take responsibility for that decision. I realize you think that bracelet (I assume it is not the legally recognized one berkeman is referring to) simplifies things, but somewhere, someone is going to have to read it, decide if it applies, then act based on it. Part of the reason a doctor gets paid those big bucks is they alone are allowed to sign your death warrant. So please don't put other people in that difficult position. Nothing an EMT can do will interfere with the decision anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes edward
  • #7
OK, I'm glad I posted. You guys gave a fresh perspective that I missed. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #8
Don't forget in an emergency situation, a bracelet can get lost, be sure as gleem pointed out that you have a living will, that there is someone with the power of attorney that knows your wishes and has that in writing and witnessed.

I am with you, my greatest fear is being a vegetable, forced to live a worthless life of nothing but pain. I feel that the right to die should be a federal law and not dependent on individual states. It isn't going to kill those that wish to live, but allows those that wish to die rather than suffer needlessly and painfully, and be a financial drain to their family allowed that right. I don't think it is right to be forced to live a life with no hope of improvement and only pain. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #9
If you carry such a bracelet, please let your loved ones know about it. In case, you were ran over by a bus and died, and the family then came to know about the bracelet, they could intrepret that you actually committed suicide. This could bring enormous pain for the family.
 
  • #10
jobyts said:
If you carry such a bracelet, please let your loved ones know about it. In case, you were ran over by a bus and died, and the family then came to know about the bracelet, they could intrepret that you actually committed suicide. This could bring enormous pain for the family.

I bet the life insurance company ( if a policy exists) would try and push the suicide issue to void the policy.
 
  • #11
I think I've gotten good advice here. Thanks all. But the advice will be hard to follow.

I have no insurance, and I haven't had a doctor since 1967.

One follow up question please. I'm a nomad. I wander and can't meet the residency requirements of any state. I have no legal address. I have mail sent to general delivery someplace where I expect to be in the future. I suppose I'll have to repeat the living will in every state I visit and to fingerprint the wills and attach a photo in lieu of an address.

Would it satisfy the legal requirements if I post all my living wills online then tattoo the shortened URL on my body? I looked at the living will web pages of a couple of states, and they offer no guidance.

I can't resist a political whine. Life was so much easier before government said, "I'm here to help you."
 
  • #12
Slask said:
I suppose I'll have to repeat the living will in every state I visit and to fingerprint the wills and attach a photo in lieu of an address.

Would it satisfy the legal requirements if I post all my living wills online then tattoo the shortened URL on my body?
Try this:
https://www.uslivingwillregistry.com/walletcard.shtm
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda

FAQ: Is Refusing All Medical Care A Rational Choice For End-Of-Life Planning?

1. What is an Enhanced DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Rational?

An Enhanced DNR Rational is a medical term used to describe a legal document or order that specifies a patient's wishes regarding resuscitation efforts in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest. It is an advanced directive that allows a patient to make decisions about their end-of-life care in advance.

2. Who can request an Enhanced DNR Rational?

An Enhanced DNR Rational can be requested by anyone who is of sound mind and over the age of 18. This includes patients, their family members, or their legal guardians. It is important for the patient to discuss their wishes with their healthcare provider to ensure that their wishes are accurately documented.

3. What are the benefits of having an Enhanced DNR Rational?

The main benefit of having an Enhanced DNR Rational is that it allows a patient to have control over their end-of-life care. It ensures that their wishes are respected and followed, even if they are unable to communicate them at the time. It also helps to prevent unnecessary and potentially harmful resuscitation efforts.

4. How is an Enhanced DNR Rational different from a regular DNR order?

An Enhanced DNR Rational is different from a regular DNR order because it allows a patient to specify their preferences for resuscitation efforts in more detail. This can include preferences for specific medical interventions, such as intubation or use of certain medications. It also allows a patient to designate a healthcare proxy to make decisions on their behalf if they are unable to do so.

5. Can an Enhanced DNR Rational be changed or revoked?

Yes, an Enhanced DNR Rational can be changed or revoked at any time by the patient as long as they are of sound mind. It is important for a patient to regularly review and update their Enhanced DNR Rational to ensure that their wishes are accurately reflected. Any changes or revocations should be discussed with their healthcare provider and documented in their medical records.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Back
Top