Is Sechx Invertible on [0,inf)?

  • Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date
In summary, the function sech(x) is invertible on the interval [0,∞) because it is strictly decreasing on this interval and therefore meets the criteria for being one-to-one. The fact that it has a maximum at the endpoint of the interval does not change this.
  • #1
Jimbo57
96
0

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?

The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?
The last part isn't true. If the domain is some proper subset of the real line, as it is in your problem, the maximum occurs at x = 0, and the maximum value is 1.

Possibly what you're thinking of is the situation where a maximum occurs at an interior point of the domain, such as, for example, y = 1 - x2 on the restricted domain [-1, 2]. The maximum occurs at (0, 1). Since y' > 0 for x ##\in## [-1, 0) and y' < 0 for x ##\in## (0, 2], this function doesn't have an inverse.
Jimbo57 said:
The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim
 
  • #3
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement



Indicate whether the function is invertible on the given interval, explain.

Sechx on [0,inf)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know a function is invertible if it's one-to-one. I can figure that out by the horizontal line test or by the first derivative test (increasing or decreasing on the interval). I know that by the first derivative test that this function has an absolute max at f(0) and is decreasing. I thought I read somewhere that a one-to-one function has to be increasing or decreasing on the interval, that f'(x) < or > 0 for all x on the interval, and that it can't have any extrema. Is this true?

The interval is the only part throwing me off here, when x=0.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Jim

Mark beat me to it.
 
  • #4
Erm... all true... except that sech(x) does have an inverse on [0,∞) ...
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
Erm... all true... except that sech(x) does have an inverse on [0,∞) ...

You've shown that ##sech(x)## is monotone decreasing on [0,∞) by applying the first derivative test.

This tells you that ##sech(x)## is indeed one to one.
 
  • #6
Actually, it has to be strictly decreasing with the possible exception of a countable number of points, which it is.
That is, it is not allowed to be constant in some interval.
 
  • #7
Thanks a lot for the input but I seem to be getting two very different and very confident answers guys. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I still feel like I'm on the fence. So, since the maxima is at the end of the interval, is it still invertible, or does that make it not invertible?
 
  • #8
Jimbo57 said:
Thanks a lot for the input but I seem to be getting two very different and very confident answers guys. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, I still feel like I'm on the fence. So, since the maxima is at the end of the interval, is it still invertible, or does that make it not invertible?

If a function is strictly decreasing over an interval, then it's invertible. Having a derivative being zero at a single point doesn't make it not strictly decreasing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #9
Your second sentence cleared up any confusion I had with regards to extrema Dick. Thanks all!
 

FAQ: Is Sechx Invertible on [0,inf)?

Is sechx an invertible function on the interval [0,inf)?

No, sechx is not an invertible function on the interval [0,inf). This is because sechx is a hyperbolic function and it does not pass the horizontal line test, meaning there are multiple values of x that can produce the same output.

How do we determine if a function is invertible?

A function is invertible if it passes both the vertical line test and the horizontal line test. This means that each input has a unique output and each output has a unique input.

Can we restrict the domain of sechx to make it invertible?

Yes, we can restrict the domain of sechx to make it invertible. One way to do this is by restricting the domain to a smaller interval, such as [0,1]. In this case, sechx will pass both the vertical line test and the horizontal line test and will be considered invertible.

What is the inverse of sechx on the interval [0,inf)?

The inverse of sechx on the interval [0,inf) is not a function. This is because for every output of sechx, there are multiple inputs that can produce that output. Therefore, the inverse of sechx is a relation, not a function.

Can we find the inverse of sechx on the interval [0,inf) using algebraic methods?

No, we cannot find the inverse of sechx on the interval [0,inf) using algebraic methods. This is because sechx is not a one-to-one function, meaning its inverse cannot be expressed as a single algebraic expression. Instead, we can use graphical or numerical methods to approximate the inverse of sechx on this interval.

Back
Top