This sounds an awful lot like a personal theory to me. What are the rules about threads with personal theories again? Aren't they supposed to be shut down?CaptTrey said:As far as empty well, I believe that in time we will find that it is not necessarily true either. 100 particles Per cubic centimeter. Does not sound empty to me.And that is just the particles we are aware of.
No, space is not completely empty. It is filled with various particles and fields, including electromagnetic radiation, cosmic rays, and the remnants of stars and galaxies.
If space is not completely empty, it means that there are particles and fields that can interact with spacecraft and affect their motion. This can impact the design and efficiency of propulsion systems.
The presence of particles in space can affect propulsion in several ways. For example, if spacecraft are traveling at high speeds, collisions with particles can cause drag and slow them down. Additionally, the presence of magnetic fields can interfere with ion thrusters, which are commonly used for propulsion.
Yes, some spacecraft propulsion systems, such as solar sails, use the particles in space for propulsion. These systems utilize the pressure of solar radiation or the solar wind to propel the spacecraft forward.
The concept of "empty space" is important in theories of propulsion because it affects the assumptions and calculations used in designing and predicting the performance of propulsion systems. If space is not empty, these systems may need to account for the interactions with particles and fields in order to function effectively.