Is Spacetime a Real Physical Entity or Merely a Conceptual Framework in Physics?

In summary, the debate surrounding whether spacetime is a real physical entity or merely a conceptual framework in physics hinges on differing interpretations of its role in the universe. Some physicists argue that spacetime is a fundamental aspect of reality, essential for understanding gravitational interactions as described by general relativity. Others contend that it is simply a mathematical tool for organizing observations and predictions, lacking independent existence. This discussion touches on the nature of reality, the limits of scientific theories, and how we conceptualize space and time in the context of physical laws.
  • #1
Michael Ray Mooney
4
3
Given that physics is the study of the physical world, what exactly is spacetime if it is an actual "real world thing", a curved medium or "fabric" guiding the movements of masses, and what is the physics of how this guidance works. As far as I know, space is a vacuum (where not occupied of course) and time is a human concept designating the duration of any specified movement, like Earth's periods of rotationand orbit. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Dale, PeterDonis and 2 others
  • #3
Michael Ray Mooney said:
Given that physics is the study of the physical world, what exactly is spacetime if it is an actual "real world thing", a curved medium or "fabric" guiding the movements of masses, and what is the physics of how this guidance works. As far as I know, space is a vacuum (where not occupied of course) and time is a human concept designating the duration of any specified movement, like Earth's periods of rotationand orbit. Thanks.
Modern physics (since Newton) is generally about finding a mathematical model that can be used to predict the outcome of experiments. Spacetime is part of the mathematics of relativity and maps to the experimental concept that events take place at a time and a spatial location.

If you want to study Relativity, you could start with Morin's book, the first chapter of which is available free online:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/david-morin/files/cmchap11.pdf

This includes an introduction to the concept of spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, PeterDonis and Ibix
  • #4
Michael Ray Mooney said:
what exactly is spacetime if it is an actual "real world thing"
Spacetime is the geometry of the “real world”.

Michael Ray Mooney said:
a curved medium or "fabric"
Why should geometry be a fabric or medium?

Michael Ray Mooney said:
what is the physics of how this guidance works
The physics of how spacetime works is described by the Einstein field equations.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, cianfa72 and russ_watters
  • #5
Michael Ray Mooney said:
Given that physics is the study of the physical world, what exactly is spacetime if it is an actual "real world thing", a curved medium or "fabric" guiding the movements of masses, and what is the physics of how this guidance works. As far as I know, space is a vacuum (where not occupied of course) and time is a human concept designating the duration of any specified movement, like Earth's periods of rotationand orbit. Thanks.
We won’t have a productive discussion unless we can say what a “real world thing” is, and the fact that we are compelled to use scare-quotes around the term is a strong hint that we aren’t there.

When we’re studying the physical world we have to start with things that we can (at least in principle) measure. Thus we start with Einstein: time is what a clock measures and distance is what a ruler measures. Observation finds relationships between these that are most effectively described using the methods of differential geometry applied to a pseudo-Riemannian manifold; we have to call that manifold something and “spacetime” is the name that has stuck. Does that make it a “real physical thing”? Who knows? How could we tell? Would the answer affect any measurement or experimental result?

Please take a moment to review this forum’s mission statement. We will gladly work with you if are here to advance your understanding of general relativity and/or to help others do so, but an uncrisp discussion of vaguely defined terms is not what we’re here for.

This thread is closed.
 
Back
Top