Is sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = -1 Algebraically Valid?

  • Thread starter TheAlkemist
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the validity of the mathematical argument sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = [sqrt(-1)]2 = -1, which involves complex numbers. It is determined that the argument is valid as long as the square root is defined as a function and only one value is returned. However, there is a subtlety in choosing the value for sqrt(-1), as there are two possible solutions: i and -i. The concept of a Riemann surface is briefly mentioned but not fully understood.
  • #1
TheAlkemist
99
0
Question:

Is the following mathematical argument algebraically valid:

sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = [sqrt(-1)]2 = -1

I know sqrt(-1) is a complex number, I just want to know if the argument above is valid.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, it's valid.

There is one subtlety: there are two numbers whose square is -1, namely [itex]i[/itex] and [itex]-i[/itex].

Your argument works fine if you choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]i[/itex]:

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = i \times i = i^2 = -1[/tex]

and equally well if you choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]-i[/itex]:

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (-i) \times (-i) = (-i)^2 = -1[/tex]

But what happens if I choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]i[/itex] for one of the square roots, and sqrt(-1) = [itex]-i[/itex] for the other one? Then I get

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (i) \times (-i) = -(i^2) = 1[/tex]

Uh oh!
 
  • #3
jbunniii said:
Yes, it's valid.

There is one subtlety: there are two numbers whose square is -1, namely [itex]i[/itex] and [itex]-i[/itex].

Your argument works fine if you choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]i[/itex]:

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = i \times i = i^2 = -1[/tex]

and equally well if you choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]-i[/itex]:

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (-i) \times (-i) = (-i)^2 = -1[/tex]

But what happens if I choose sqrt(-1) = [itex]i[/itex] for one of the square roots, and sqrt(-1) = [itex]-i[/itex] for the other one? Then I get

[tex]\sqrt{-1} \times \sqrt{-1} = (i) \times (-i) = -(i^2) = 1[/tex]

Uh oh!

LOL @ "uh oh!"

Thanks. I actually just searched through the threads and see that this question has been asked several times in different ways. But it make sense now. Thanks again.
 
  • #4
That so I was told, is the reason for i. Then the matter becomes [tex]\sqrt(-1)x\sqrt(-1) = i^2 = -1.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
The point is that you have to define sqrt() to be a function, i.e. return only one value. I think this is called principal value. Then your calculations works. You just have to remember that [itex]sqrt(x^2)\neq x[/itex] in general.

But I'm not completely sure about this Riemann surface business and what it's for :)
 

FAQ: Is sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = -1 Algebraically Valid?

What is the value of sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1)?

The value of sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) is equal to -1.

Is the equation sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) = -1 algebraically valid?

Yes, the equation is algebraically valid. According to the properties of complex numbers, the product of two square roots is equal to the square root of their product, which in this case is -1.

Can you explain why sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) is equal to -1?

Sure, we can use the rules of exponents to show that the square root of -1 is equal to i, the imaginary unit. Therefore, sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) can be rewritten as i x i, which is equal to i^2. By definition, i^2 is equal to -1, so sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) is equal to -1.

Is it always true that the product of two square roots is equal to the square root of their product?

Yes, this is a property of complex numbers known as the product of square roots rule. It states that the square root of a product is equal to the product of the square roots of each factor. This can be extended to any number of square roots multiplying together.

Can sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) be simplified further?

No, sqrt(-1) x sqrt(-1) is already in its simplest form. As mentioned before, it simplifies to i^2, which is equal to -1. There are no further operations that can be performed to simplify this expression.

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
874
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top