- #1
tozhan
- 28
- 0
if string theory is so brillient how come i can't find any info on how string theory says beta decay MUST happen. I keep asking and getting the answer "string theory does not yet deal with that level of detail". I mean, how can this be?? how can a theory be so widly accepted and not explain the smallest interactions? Maybe it does fit with the grand scale universe and quantum world but one of the greatest achievments of mankind in the 20th century was spliting the atom, as far as I am aware (which is extremely limited) string theory can't explain simple events like weak interaction. If each particle is a single string that is ocillating at some given frequency then how can beta decay produce an electron and electron antineutrino from a 'd' quark?? surly this would mean that the quark is an ocillating string and the electron and electron antineutrino two other 'new' strings. Where did these come from? can we just create string? maybe from energy, like in quantum chromodynamics where it is more energy efficient to create a new quark-antiquark pair.
Is there a basic underlying flaw in my idea of string theory because it seems hard to accept as a leading theory when ANY event of this type seems not to fit in?
PLEASE HELP
thx
Tom
Is there a basic underlying flaw in my idea of string theory because it seems hard to accept as a leading theory when ANY event of this type seems not to fit in?
PLEASE HELP
thx
Tom