- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:
===============================================================================================
"27.21 Definition
If R is a commutative ring with unity and [TEX] a \in R [/TEX] , the ideal [TEX] \{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.
An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some [TEX] a \in R [/TEX]
=================================================================================================
Consider [TEX] N =\{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] ......(1)
If we take r = a in (1) then we have [TEX] ra = aa = a^2 \in N [/TEX]
If we take r = a and [TEX] a^2 \in N [/TEX] the we have using (1) again that [TEX] ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N[/TEX]
Continuing this, then we have [TEX] a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 [/TEX] , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where [TEX] r \ne a [/TEX]
Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?
Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.
Peter
===============================================================================================
"27.21 Definition
If R is a commutative ring with unity and [TEX] a \in R [/TEX] , the ideal [TEX] \{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.
An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some [TEX] a \in R [/TEX]
=================================================================================================
Consider [TEX] N =\{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] ......(1)
If we take r = a in (1) then we have [TEX] ra = aa = a^2 \in N [/TEX]
If we take r = a and [TEX] a^2 \in N [/TEX] the we have using (1) again that [TEX] ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N[/TEX]
Continuing this, then we have [TEX] a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 [/TEX] , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where [TEX] r \ne a [/TEX]
Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?
Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.
Peter