Is the Analysis of Principal Ideals Correct?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Nature
In summary, a principal ideal in a commutative ring with unity is an ideal generated by a single element and denoted <a>, where a is an element of the ring. This means that all multiples of a are contained in the ideal, including a itself and its powers. This analysis is correct and can be used to determine the nature of principal ideals.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and [TEX] a \in R [/TEX] , the ideal [TEX] \{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some [TEX] a \in R [/TEX]

=================================================================================================

Consider [TEX] N =\{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have [TEX] ra = aa = a^2 \in N [/TEX]

If we take r = a and [TEX] a^2 \in N [/TEX] the we have using (1) again that [TEX] ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N[/TEX]

Continuing this, then we have [TEX] a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 [/TEX] , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where [TEX] r \ne a [/TEX]

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Peter said:
Fraleigh (A First Course in Abstract Algebra) defines principal ideals in section 27 on page 250. His definition is as follows:

===============================================================================================

"27.21 Definition

If R is a commutative ring with unity and [TEX] a \in R [/TEX] , the ideal [TEX] \{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] of all multiples of a is the principal ideal generated by a and is denoted <a>.

An ideal N of R is a principal ideal if N = <a> for some [TEX] a \in R [/TEX]

=================================================================================================

Consider [TEX] N =\{ ra | r \in R \} [/TEX] ......(1)

If we take r = a in (1) then we have [TEX] ra = aa = a^2 \in N [/TEX]

If we take r = a and [TEX] a^2 \in N [/TEX] the we have using (1) again that [TEX] ra = a^2 a = a^3 \in N[/TEX]

Continuing this, then we have [TEX] a, a^2, a^3, a^4, a^5 [/TEX] , ... all belonging to N along with the other elements where [TEX] r \ne a [/TEX]

Is the above analysis correct regarding the nature of principal ideals?

Would really appreciate this issue being clarified.

Peter

Hi Peter!

Yes, that is correct.

You might also say that $r=a^n \in R$ for $n \in \mathbb N$, so $a^n \cdot a = a^{n+1} \in N$.
And since you also have unity in R, it follows that $1a \in N$, and therefore $a^n \in N$.
 
  • #3
Thanks so much for that clarification - can now proceed on with some confidence :D
 

FAQ: Is the Analysis of Principal Ideals Correct?

What are principal ideals?

Principal ideals are a type of ideal in abstract algebra that are generated by a single element. In other words, a principal ideal is a set of all elements that can be obtained by multiplying a given element by any element in the ring.

How are principal ideals different from other types of ideals?

The key difference between principal ideals and other types of ideals, such as prime ideals or maximal ideals, is that principal ideals are generated by a single element while other ideals may be generated by multiple elements.

What is the significance of principal ideals in abstract algebra?

Principal ideals play an important role in the study of rings and fields, as they allow for a better understanding of the structure and properties of these mathematical objects. They also have applications in various areas of mathematics, such as number theory and algebraic geometry.

How are principal ideals related to divisibility?

In a principal ideal domain (PID), which is a type of ring where every ideal is a principal ideal, the concept of divisibility can be extended to non-integer elements. Specifically, an element a is said to divide an element b if b is an element of the principal ideal generated by a.

Can all ideals be expressed as principal ideals?

No, not all ideals can be expressed as principal ideals. In fact, there are many rings where not all ideals are principal ideals. However, in certain rings, such as PIDs and Euclidean domains, all ideals are principal ideals.

Back
Top