Is the Closure of a Totally Bounded Set Also Totally Bounded?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sazanda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if a set S is precompact, then its closure S(closure) is compact. Participants clarify that precompactness is equivalent to total boundedness in the context of subsets of the complex numbers C. The approach suggested involves demonstrating that the closure of a totally bounded set remains totally bounded, utilizing the Heine-Borel theorem. There is some confusion regarding definitions, but the consensus is to focus on the properties of totally bounded sets. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts to complete the proof effectively.
sazanda
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be a subset of C. Prove that S is precompact if and only
if S(closure) is compact.

Homework Equations



I have already showed if S(closure) compact, then S is precompact
how can I show if S is precompact, then S(closure) is compact?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.
 
Bacle said:
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.

I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.
 
Definition:
A set S is precompact if every ε>0 then S can be covered by finitely many discs of radius ε .
 
micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

We didn't cover totally boundedness. I think we should use definition of precompactess.
 
Sazanda:
The definition you gave is the same as that of totally-bounded. I mean, totally.
 
totally bounded

micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

how Can I show that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded?

solution Tried:

Assume S is totally bounded. then for very ε>0 there are finitely many discs (O=Union of finitely many discs) that covers S let x be a limit points of S that is in S closure. but not in S.
hence x is in O (how can I show this?)
So x is in O for all x in S closure.
Hence S closure is totally bounded.

Am I on the right track?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K