Is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter a fudge?

In summary, the likelihood for dark matter appears to be lessening in direct detection and in its utility in explaining astronomical anomalies. With regard to the former, a trio of recent dark matter detection experiments (LUX 2016, PandaX II 2017 and Xenon1t 2018) have all failed to show any non-baryonic matter. The remaining parameter space is almost obliterated. Further attempts at CERN have, also, not shown any new physics. As to the latter, work by J. Jalocha, F. Cooperstock, and A. Deur all provide competent alternatives to explain galaxy rotation curves without dark matter or modifying gravity. However, despite this the Planck mission confidently quote Ωc h^2 as
  • #36
Adrian59 said:
What appears obvious to you is because you have bought into this narrative
This attitude is not going to lead to a productive discussion. Thread closed.
 
<h2> What is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?</h2><p>The CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) interpretation for dark matter is a theory that suggests that the fluctuations in the CMBR, which is the residual radiation from the Big Bang, can provide clues about the existence and distribution of dark matter in the universe.</p><h2> How does the CMBR interpretation for dark matter work?</h2><p>The CMBR interpretation for dark matter works by analyzing the patterns and fluctuations in the CMBR data. These patterns can reveal the presence of dark matter, which does not interact with light and therefore cannot be directly observed.</p><h2> Is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter widely accepted?</h2><p>While the CMBR interpretation for dark matter is a popular theory among scientists, it is not universally accepted. Some scientists believe that there are other explanations for the observed CMBR fluctuations, and that the CMBR interpretation for dark matter may be a "fudge" or a convenient explanation for a phenomenon that is not fully understood.</p><h2> What evidence supports the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?</h2><p>There is strong evidence to support the CMBR interpretation for dark matter, including observations from the Planck satellite and other experiments. The CMBR data shows consistent patterns that are difficult to explain without the presence of dark matter.</p><h2> Are there any alternative theories to the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?</h2><p>Yes, there are alternative theories to the CMBR interpretation for dark matter, such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and the WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) model. These theories propose different explanations for the observed CMBR fluctuations and the role of dark matter in the universe.</p>

FAQ: Is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter a fudge?

What is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?

The CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) interpretation for dark matter is a theory that suggests that the fluctuations in the CMBR, which is the residual radiation from the Big Bang, can provide clues about the existence and distribution of dark matter in the universe.

How does the CMBR interpretation for dark matter work?

The CMBR interpretation for dark matter works by analyzing the patterns and fluctuations in the CMBR data. These patterns can reveal the presence of dark matter, which does not interact with light and therefore cannot be directly observed.

Is the CMBR interpretation for dark matter widely accepted?

While the CMBR interpretation for dark matter is a popular theory among scientists, it is not universally accepted. Some scientists believe that there are other explanations for the observed CMBR fluctuations, and that the CMBR interpretation for dark matter may be a "fudge" or a convenient explanation for a phenomenon that is not fully understood.

What evidence supports the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?

There is strong evidence to support the CMBR interpretation for dark matter, including observations from the Planck satellite and other experiments. The CMBR data shows consistent patterns that are difficult to explain without the presence of dark matter.

Are there any alternative theories to the CMBR interpretation for dark matter?

Yes, there are alternative theories to the CMBR interpretation for dark matter, such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and the WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) model. These theories propose different explanations for the observed CMBR fluctuations and the role of dark matter in the universe.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top