Is the Complex Direct Stress Equation Correctly Simplified?

In summary, the conversation discussed a problem involving trigonometry and transformations of coordinates. The first question asked about the difference between dividing the entire equation by |AB| or just the |BC| part. The second question asked about a boxed equation and how it relates to calculus. It was explained that the second part involves deriving Mohr's circle for plane stress and using trig identities to calculate the forces keeping a wedge in equilibrium. The conversation also touched on using the double angle formula and factoring in order to solve the problem.
  • #1
Mechaman
40
1
Attached image with problem.
IMAG0038_1.jpg

2 Questions;

1.
δn.|AB| = δx.|BC|.cosΘ
becomes
δn = δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB|

This is dividing the entire "δx.|BC|.cosΘ" equation by |AB| or just the |BC| part? Is there a difference?

2.
Half way down page, boxed equation. How does δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB| = δxcos^2Θ and then 1/2(δx+δy)
Is this calculus? Should I find this in a log table I've been searching but haven't found where to look this up.

Thanks for any help.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Mechaman said:
Attached image with problem.
View attachment 89360
2 Questions;

1.
δn.|AB| = δx.|BC|.cosΘ
becomes
δn = δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB|

This is dividing the entire "δx.|BC|.cosΘ" equation by |AB| or just the |BC| part? Is there a difference?

It's simple trig. |BC| / |AB| = cos (θ)
2.
Half way down page, boxed equation. How does δx.|BC|.cosΘ / |AB| = δxcos^2Θ and then 1/2(δx+δy)
Is this calculus? Should I find this in a log table I've been searching but haven't found where to look this up.

A log table? No, it's not calculus, either. It has more to do with transforming coordinates and using trig identities than with anything exotic like log tables or calculus.

You can find a derivation for these formulas along with discussions on deriving Mohr's circle for plane stress.

https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/structge/mohrcirc.htm

The basic idea is to assume the wedge is in equilibrium and to calculate the forces which keep it in equilibrium from the stresses on the sides of the wedge.
 
  • Like
Likes Mechaman
  • #3
Thanks I understand the first part now I have the double angle forumula.

I partly understand the second part until the last factoring:

δx(1+cos2θ)1/2 + δy(1-cos2θ)1/2
1/2(δx+δy) + 1/2(δx-δy)cos2θ

I know this type of factoring looks familiar its been a while since I've done this type of stuff.
 

FAQ: Is the Complex Direct Stress Equation Correctly Simplified?

What is the "Complex Direct Stress equation" used for?

The Complex Direct Stress equation is used to calculate the stress on a material that is subjected to a combination of axial and shear forces.

How is the Complex Direct Stress equation different from the simple stress equation?

The Complex Direct Stress equation takes into account both axial and shear forces, while the simple stress equation only considers axial forces.

Can the Complex Direct Stress equation be applied to any material?

Yes, the Complex Direct Stress equation can be applied to any material as long as the material properties and the forces acting on it are known.

Is the Complex Direct Stress equation accurate for all loading conditions?

The Complex Direct Stress equation is accurate for linear-elastic materials and small deformations, but it may not accurately predict stress under nonlinear or dynamic loading conditions.

Are there any limitations to using the Complex Direct Stress equation?

The Complex Direct Stress equation assumes that the material is homogenous and isotropic, and it does not account for temperature, creep, or fatigue effects. Thus, it may not be accurate for all materials and loading conditions.

Back
Top