I Is the CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory the Key to Solving the Antimatter Mystery?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quarker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Universe
AI Thread Summary
The CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory proposes that an anti-universe exists alongside our own, potentially explaining the antimatter mystery. Questions arise about the existence of this anti-universe before the Big Bang and whether our universe is time-reversed from its perspective. For the theory to resolve the antimatter issue, the total charge of particles in both universes must balance, suggesting they could be mirror images of each other. Interaction between the two universes through electromagnetism is considered plausible, though challenging to detect. The theory's appeal lies in its symmetry and the aesthetic implications of a creator, but empirical evidence remains essential for validation.
Quarker
Messages
103
Reaction score
10
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08928.

This is a simple and elegant theory, but there are some things I don’t understand. Why would the anti-universe exist before the Big Bang? From the viewpoint of the anti-universe, isn’t our universe time-reversed?

Also, unless the total charge of all particles of the two universes is zero, this doesn’t solve the antimatter issue. For the charges to balance out, the two universes would have to be identical; for every particle in one universe, there would have to be an anti-particle in the other. Neil Turok has said that quantum uncertainty would lead to different universes.

If the two universes are identical, except for being mirror images of one another, do they interact in some way? Electromagnetism seems the likeliest candidate for that. An electromagnetic null wave making the jump to a time-reversed universe seems possible in such a theory, although detecting it might prove difficult.

The main attraction of this theory for me is the symmetry, and the non-zero possibility that such symmetry arises from the aesthetic choices of a creator. But as always, the evidence comes first.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Matter and anti-matter are linked by the CPT symmetry, the T of which stands for time. That is, the arrow of time* is reversed for anti-matter compared to normal matter. So from the point of origin, normal matter goes forward in time, while anti-matter goes backwards in time.

* Note: the quantum arrow of time doesn't actually have to be the same as the macroscopic one we observe. I believe this paper is proposing that they are the same.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top