- #1
Loren Booda
- 3,125
- 4
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,615608,00.html"
Last edited by a moderator:
arildno said:It is still rather strange that, if I understand it correctly, the fingerprints have only surfaced in unsolved crime cases. Why should not the fingerprints be present at the sites of numerous indubitably solved crimes as well??
Apparently they are still uncertain about the contamination after testing swabs randomly and finding nothing so there may only be one in every who-knows-how-many swabs that are contaminated.Monique said:Whatever happened with including a negative control? The DNA should have showed up in there as well.
The most elusive serial killer is currently unknown, as they have not been caught or identified.
The number of victims attributed to the most elusive serial killer is also unknown, as their identity and crimes have not been identified.
Since the most elusive serial killer has not been caught or identified, their methods are also unknown.
The most elusive serial killer is difficult to catch because they are skilled at avoiding detection, leaving little evidence behind, and possibly changing their methods and patterns to avoid being caught.
There are many theories about the identity of the most elusive serial killer, but without any concrete evidence or identification, they remain just theories.