Is the Hubble Telescope in Need of Another Repair?

  • Thread starter LowlyPion
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Launch
In summary: ESA... video.I noted that Discovery Channel mounted a modest effort that wasn't half bad today. Unfortunately I never got linked to the NASA... or ESA... video.
  • #36
LEO is a popular neighbourhood, Hubble is also limited to being in an orbit that the shuttle can reach which isn't ideal for a bunch of other reasons.
It's not so much specifically Hubble but there are lots of things at that sort of orbit, the collision a couple of months ago didn't help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
NASA said:
Due to the crew sleeping an hour later, the Hubble mission's timeline also will shift one hour to the right.

http://twitter.com/nasa

:rolleyes:
 
  • #38
Hubble EVA videos - in high resolution!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPVIbHFP_s4

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
mgb_phys said:
LEO is a popular neighbourhood, Hubble is also limited to being in an orbit that the shuttle can reach which isn't ideal for a bunch of other reasons.
It's not so much specifically Hubble but there are lots of things at that sort of orbit, the collision a couple of months ago didn't help

Soooooo, I guess that normally the shuttle is at lower and safer altitudes, and the Hubble required a higher altitude, so a compromise was required that left Hubble in a somewhat undesirable orbit wrt the risk of a collision?
 
  • #40
Well the ideal place to put Hubble is something like L2 but that's 1.5M km away so a bit tricky. Other than that - the higher the better, the lower you are the more drag the more the Earth gets in the way and the low inclination orbit from the cape means it hits the SAA.
The height is a bit of a compromise - of the first set of shuttles only a couple could reach it (IIRC) which caused some more delays

Collision wise there's nothing particularly bad about Hubble's orbit that 10km up or down would really help.
 
  • #41
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iTXU_Tjsa2sPYDLX--U8e4eS1TtQ
CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (AFP) — NASA on Saturday further delayed the return to Earth of the space shuttle Atlantis and its seven-man crew because of poor weather.

Attempts to land the shuttle, following a successful mission to repair the Hubble telescope, had to be completely abandoned on Friday because of inclement conditions at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

NASA said it had decided not to use the first window of opportunity on Saturday, scheduled for 9:16 am (1316 GMT), for the same reason.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/media/ALeqM5gDr6KtQc4g7DP2I9IVpZbalGCsbg?size=l

NASA said:
The next two landing opportunities are at Edwards Air Force Base in California at 10:45 a.m. or Kennedy again at 10:54 a.m.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/launch/landing_blog.html

NASA said:
For a 10:45aET landing at Edwardds, the deorbit burn would occur at 9:29a. Mission Control continues to monitor weather at Kennedy though.
http://twitter.com/nasa
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #42
NASA said:
"Go" for Edwards Deorbit Burn
Mission control at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston just gave the astronauts aboard Atlantis a "go" for the deorbit burn on orbit 197, putting them on course for a 11:39 a.m. touchdown in California. This firing of the two orbital maneuvering system engines will slow the shuttle enough to begin the glide back to Earth.

Atlantis Looks Toward California Landing
Mission control has decided a Florida landing today is a "no go" due to weather around the landing site but they will continue to target the landing at Edwards on the 197th orbit, putting touchdown in California at 11:39 a.m. Deorbit burn would come at 10:24 a.m.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/launch/landing_blog.html
 
  • #43
Oh, sweet - I'm going to be in Orlando next week. Maybe I'll get to see it fly back!
 
  • #44
Burn is complete and the shuttle is maneuvering to nose-first position for atmospheric entry.
 
  • #46
Welcome home!
 
  • #47
Safely down - perfect landing.
 
  • #48


drankin said:
I thought we already fixed hubble? What's wrong with it?

is he having a laugh?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top