Is the Integral of an Analytic Function Divergent at Infinity?

  • Thread starter eljose
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Paradox
In summary: So, you have the pointwise convergence of the power series on (-\infty,\infty), but NOT uniform convergence on (-\infty,\infty), which is what is required for the interchange of limits, so your problem is solved.
  • #1
eljose
492
0
let be the analytic everywhere function f(x) with limit tending to +oo and -oo with oo0 infinite then we want to calculate the integral..

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}dxe^{-x^{2}}=0.5\sqrt{\pi}[/tex]

ot do so we expand the exponential function into a power series (we can do it as the function is analytic everywhere) so we have...

[tex]exp(-x^2)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n}[/tex]

but the integral of this power series is divergent in the form:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}(\infty)^{n} [/tex]

wich is clearly infinite...so where is the solution to this paradox?..thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
eljose said:
[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-x^{2}}dx=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}[/tex]
expand the exponential function into a power series (we can do it as the function is analytic everywhere) so we have...
[tex]exp(-x^2)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{n}[/tex]
.
hold-it, try:
.
[tex]exp(-x^2)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}x^{2n}}{n!}[/tex]
.
eljose said:
but the integral of this power series is divergent in the form:
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}(\infty)^{n} [/tex]
wich is clearly infinite...so where is the solution to this paradox?..thanks.
.
It's no longer clearly divergent, it converges to 0 since [tex]exp(-x^2)=\frac{1}{exp(x^2)}[/tex] goes to zero as x -> [tex]\infty[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #3
i like the way you start by setting f to be some every analytic function and then never mention f again after defining it. putting x=infinity into something arbitrary with no other information is rarely a good idea for determining anything.
 
  • #4
Yes but you have the series:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}{\infty}^{2n}}{n!}[/tex]

that you can check that is infinite...
 
  • #5
That series is completely meaningless, what with infinity not being a real (or complex) number and everything.
 
  • #6
eljose said:
Yes but you have the series:
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}{\infty}^{2n}}{n!}[/tex]
that you can check that is infinite...

You're trying to treat infinity like a number here and substitute it into a power series. This is not valid, it's nonsense.
 
  • #7
eljose said:
Yes but you have the series:
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}{\infty}^{2n}}{n!}[/tex]
that you can check that is infinite...
Do you understand what a limit is?
 
  • #8
Here it is. Gamma(1/2).

To prove that [tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-x^{2}}dx=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}[/tex]
Put [tex]I=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-x^{2}}dx[/tex] so that [tex]I^2=\int_{x=0}^{\infty}e^{-x^{2}}dx\int_{y=0}^{\infty}e^{-y^{2}}dy=\int_{y=0}^{\infty}\int_{x=0}^{\infty}e^{-(x^{2}+y^{2})}dxdy[/tex].
Now Transform to polar coordinates, and note that the first quadrant (e.g. QI) is one quarter of an infinite plane in rectangluar coordinates, so too is it one quarter of an infinite circle in polar coordinates (you can prove it with using squeeze theorem if your so inclined); you get
[tex]I^2=\int_{\theta=0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\int_{r=0}^{\infty}e^{-r^{2}}rdrd\theta=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\theta=0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}d\theta\int_{u=0}^{\infty}e^{-u}du=\frac{\pi}{4}\lim_{M \rightarrow \infty}(1-e^{-M})=\frac{\pi}{4}[/tex]
Therefore, [tex]I=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}[/tex].
To explain the title of my post: the Euler Gamma function can be defined as follows: [tex]\Gamma(z)=\int_{t=0}^{\infty}e^{-t}t^{z-1}dt[/tex] which converges
[tex]\forall z\in \mathhbb{C}[/tex] such that [tex]\Re{z}>0[/tex]. The given integral is equal to [tex]\Gamma(\frac{1}{2})[/tex].
The Gamma function is the well studied analytic continuation of the factorial to all complex values except non-positive integers. In particular, [tex]\Gamma(n)=(n-1)!, \forall n\in\mathbb{N}[/tex].
Enjoy.o:)
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Yes but let,s suppose we have the integral:
[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}dxe^{-{cos(x)}} [/tex]
you can see that exp(-cos(x)) is analytic everywhere so we can substitute the function by its Taylor series in the form:
[tex]exp(-cos(x))=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)x^{n} [/tex] there is no error in that so we would have that the integral would be the limit:
[tex]Lim k--->\infty\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)k^{n}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
What are you trying to do? If it were to abuse latex you're succeeding. \lim will produce limits proper, and \text{foo} produces foo as if it were text. Now, how about trying to explain what it is you want to know? Are you just trolling now? OUt of curiosity (and I can never remember the answer) under what conditions are we allowed to interchange function with its taylor series, the integral of a sum with the sum of the integrals, and the limit of a sum with the sum of the limits?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
1. You can exchange a function with it's taylor series whenever the function is analytic in that region (sometimes that's how we define analytic!).

2. The integral of a sum is always the of the integrals.

3. The limit of a sum is the sum of the limits if... I can't remember this one.
 
  • #12
eljose said:
Yes but let,s suppose we have the integral:
[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}dxe^{-{cos(x)}} [/tex]
you can see that exp(-cos(x)) is analytic everywhere so we can substitute the function by its Taylor series in the form:
[tex]exp(-cos(x))=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)x^{n} [/tex] there is no error in that so we would have that the integral would be the limit:
[tex]\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b(n)k^{n}[/tex]

Yes, that is because this integral is divergent. I changed you sum to have b(n) as some integration is necessary, not just taking the limit of the power series, and, by the way, uniform convergence is required for the interchange of limit operations (e.g., to say that the integral of an infinite sum is the infinite sum of the integrals requires uniform convergence of the power series, not analyticity).

But you have something of a valid concern, perhaps this would help you:

[tex]e^{-x^{2}}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}{x}^{2n}}{n!}[/tex]

does indeed converge on every bounded closed interval, say [-M,M], per the ratio test as

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}|\frac{(-1)^{n+1}{x}^{2n+2}}{(n+1)!}\cdot\frac{n!}{(-1)^{n}{x}^{2n}}|=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{{x}^{2}}{n+1}=0,\forall x\in(-\infty,\infty)[/tex] this limit is zero for all finite x, and hence the series converges on every bounded closed interval.
It is also of note that the above series for [tex]e^{-x^{2}}[/tex] converges uniformly on every bounded closed interval, (but not on unbounded ones that admit infinities). This accounts for the following facts:

While [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\frac{(-1)^{n}{x}^{2n}}{n!}=0[/tex], suprisingly
[tex]\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\frac{(-1)^{n}{x}^{2n}}{n!}=-\infty[/tex]; this is because the convergence of the series is NOT uniform on unbounded intervals (when x is an infinity).
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Is the Integral of an Analytic Function Divergent at Infinity?

What is an analytic function?

An analytic function is a complex-valued function that can be represented by a convergent power series in some region of the complex plane. It is also known as a holomorphic function.

What does it mean for the integral of an analytic function to be divergent at infinity?

If the integral of an analytic function does not converge as the limit of integration approaches infinity, it is considered to be divergent at infinity. This means that the function does not have a finite area under the curve when integrated from a starting point to infinity.

Can the integral of an analytic function be convergent at some points and divergent at others?

Yes, the convergence or divergence of the integral of an analytic function depends on the behavior of the function at different points. It is possible for the integral to converge at some points and diverge at others.

How can one determine if the integral of an analytic function is divergent at infinity?

One way to determine if the integral of an analytic function is divergent at infinity is to analyze the behavior of the function at infinity. If the function grows faster than the reciprocal of the distance from the origin, then the integral is divergent at infinity.

Are there any exceptions to the rule that the integral of an analytic function is divergent at infinity?

Yes, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For example, if the function is bounded at infinity or decays faster than the reciprocal of the distance from the origin, then the integral can converge at infinity.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
452
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top