Is the observable universe is spatially flat?

  • Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Space
In summary, the observation of a flat universe is supported by the CMB power spectrum, BAO data, and Hubble expansion rate measurements.
  • #1
TrickyDicky
3,507
28
Besides the power spectrum from the CMB, what other observational evidences suggest that our observable universe is spatially flat?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a parameter Ω, which is related to the total mass + energy of the universe. A flat universe is given by Ω =1. Current estimates of baryonic matter + dark matter + dark energy add up to Ω = 1.
 
  • #3
mathman said:
There is a parameter Ω, which is related to the total mass + energy of the universe. A flat universe is given by Ω =1. Current estimates of baryonic matter + dark matter + dark energy add up to Ω = 1.

Yeah, but that estimates are mainly from the CMB angular power spectrum, my question was what other observational evidence is there?
 
  • #4
By measuring distance and redshift to type Ia supernovae we can track expansion history. Since expansion depends on density we see that observations fit with omega=1.
 
  • #5
Calimero said:
By measuring distance and redshift to type Ia supernovae we can track expansion history. Since expansion depends on density we see that observations fit with omega=1.

I believe is the other way around, we assume a flat model first (later confirmed by CMB) and we fit the SN observations in that model, getting as a result an accelerated expansion that introduced a new parameter, dark energy. So the SNIa observations fit the model, they are not in itself evidence of flatness.
 
  • #6
No, you got it wrong. It is flat because omega is 1. For some other value it will not be flat. In addition you can calculate it as (3c^2Ho^2)/8piG, and many measurments confirmed Hubble parametar to Ho=71 km/sec per mpc.
 
  • #7
TrickyDicky said:
Yeah, but that estimates are mainly from the CMB angular power spectrum, my question was what other observational evidence is there?
The best current evidence stems from the combination of CMB and BAO data.

The CMB sets a length scale of our universe at a redshift of [itex]z=1090[/itex]. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, on the other hand, set a length scale of our universe around roughly [itex]z=1[/itex] to [itex]z=2[/itex]. This extremely long lever arm let's us do the equivalent of drawing a huge triangle across the universe, a triangle that we can then check the angles of and see if they add up to 180 degrees.
 
  • #8
For illustration, see http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union/figures/Union2_Om-Ol_systematics_slide.pdf" . Any two of the three (BAO, SN,CMB) indicate flatness, but only combinations including CMB give strong constraints.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
Ich said:
For illustration, see http://supernova.lbl.gov/Union/figures/Union2_Om-Ol_systematics_slide.pdf" . Any two of the three (BAO, SN,CMB) indicate flatness, but only combinations including CMB give strong constraints.
I should mention that the supernova measurements are almost completely degenerate with the curvature (this is because for supernovae, the curvature is almost completely degenerate with the intrinsic brightness, which is not very well-known and is fit as a free parameter for most SN data analysis computations). But they do constrain other cosmological parameters, in particular the ratio between matter density and dark energy density.

It's also worth mentioning that as you can see from that plot, CMB alone doesn't actually constrain curvature all that much. But all you need to do to get it to constrain curvature is add a measurement of the nearby Hubble expansion rate. This anchors the CMB observations, allowing curvature to be tightly constrained.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Is the observable universe is spatially flat?

What does it mean for the observable universe to be spatially flat?

When we say that the observable universe is spatially flat, it means that the universe has a flat geometry on a large scale. This means that the angles of a triangle drawn on the surface of the universe would add up to exactly 180 degrees, just like in Euclidean geometry. This is in contrast to a curved or non-Euclidean geometry, where the angles of a triangle would add up to more or less than 180 degrees.

How do we know that the observable universe is spatially flat?

Scientists have used various methods to measure the curvature of the universe, such as studying the cosmic microwave background radiation and observing the distribution of galaxies. These measurements have consistently shown that the universe is very close to being spatially flat, with a margin of error of less than 1%. This indicates that the observable universe is indeed flat on a large scale.

What implications does a flat observable universe have for our understanding of the cosmos?

A flat observable universe has significant implications for our understanding of the cosmos. It suggests that the universe is infinite in size, has always existed, and will continue to exist forever. It also supports the idea of the universe undergoing a period of rapid expansion in its early stages, known as inflation. Additionally, a flat universe is consistent with the theory of dark energy, which is thought to be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe.

Are there any competing theories to the idea of a flat observable universe?

There have been some competing theories to the idea of a flat observable universe, such as the idea of a closed universe with positive curvature or an open universe with negative curvature. However, these theories have largely been ruled out by observational evidence. One alternative theory is the idea of a "bumpy" universe, where there are small fluctuations in the curvature of space, but overall it is still considered to be flat.

How does the concept of a flat observable universe relate to the concept of the "edge" of the universe?

The concept of a flat observable universe does not necessarily imply the existence of an "edge" to the universe. In fact, the idea of a flat universe suggests that it is infinite in size, with no boundaries or edges. However, our observable universe is limited by the distance that light has had time to travel since the beginning of the universe, so we can only see a certain portion of the entire universe. This can sometimes be confused with the idea of an edge, but in reality, the universe may extend infinitely beyond what we can observe.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
1K
Back
Top