Is the Proof of E=mc² Valid for Accelerating Objects in Special Relativity?

In summary, the conversation discusses the proof of E=mc² through the work and relativistic mass equations. There is a discussion about the validity of Special Relativity for accelerating frames of reference and the concept of "relativistic mass". The conversation also touches on the methods used to measure relativistic mass and the difference between operational and analytical definitions in physics.
  • #36
Dickfore said:
Also this reference:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/"

Thank you too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

I Best Derivation of E=mc^2 - Fdx = V^2 dm
Replies
17
Views
2K
B What is m in Kinetic Energy? Relativistic mass or Rest mass?
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
I Escape velocity near a black hole: Newtonian or Special Relativity?
Replies
17
Views
881
I The Energy - Momentum Equation vs the Energy - Mass Equation
4
Replies
131
Views
10K
B Relativistic Photon Mass: Can It Exist?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Deriving e=mc^2, how is it possible?
Replies
2
Views
789
I Uncovering a Decent Proof of E=mc^2
Replies
14
Views
2K
B What if we use a non physical reference point to measure an object's mass?
Replies
5
Views
680
I Relativistic Energy Dispersion Relation: Explained
Replies
10
Views
2K
I E=mc^2 Mass: Rest Mass m0 vs Relativistic Mass γm0
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top