Is the Set of Increasing Continuous Functions on [0,1] Closed?

  • Thread starter l888l888l888
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Closed
In summary, the homework statement is to prove that the set of continuous functions on [0,1] that are increasing is a closed set. The Attempt at a Solution suggests that in order to prove the complement of this closed set is open, one must prove that the set of continuous functions on [0,1] that are non-increasing is open. This is done by proving that there exists a function g such that for every interval [a,b] such that f(b)<f(a), g(b)<g(a). In this case, by looking at the graph of f, one can see that g must be close to f so that the inequality in question is met.
  • #1
l888l888l888
50
0

Homework Statement


prove that the set of continuous functions on [0,1] that are increasing is a closed set.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Need to prove the complement is open. So need to prove the set of continuous functions on [0,1] that are non increasing is open. Let f be a continuous function that is non increasing on [0,1]. need to choose an epsilon st B(f)={g in C([0,1]): sup|g(x)-f(x)|<epsilon} is contained in the set of continuous functions on [0,1] that are non increasing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi l888l888l888! :smile:

So f is nonincreasing. So let [a,b] be an interval such that f(b)<f(a). How close must a function g be such that also g(b)<g(a)??

As a further hint, you must find an [itex]\varepsilon >0[/itex] such that every element in [itex][f(b)-\varepsilon,f(b)+\varepsilon][/itex] is smaller than [itex]f(a)-\varepsilon[/itex], do you see why?
 
  • #3
well i narrowed it down to a few cases. assuming we have an interval [f(b),f(a)] ...
if g(b)<f(b) then |g(a)-f(b)| has to be less than |g(b)-f(b)|. if f(b)<g(b)<f(a) then |g(a)-f(a)| has to be less than |g(b)-f(a)| and the last case for g(b)> f(a) i have not figured out. I am basically going about this by looking at this graphically and trying to write it out as a proof
 
  • #4
l888l888l888 said:
well i narrowed it down to a few cases. assuming we have an interval [f(b),f(a)] ...
if g(b)<f(b) then |g(a)-f(b)| has to be less than |g(b)-f(b)|. if f(b)<g(b)<f(a) then |g(a)-f(a)| has to be less than |g(b)-f(a)| and the last case for g(b)> f(a) i have not figured out. I am basically going about this by looking at this graphically and trying to write it out as a proof

You have to eliminate the last case by choosing [itex]\varepsilon[/itex] small enough...
 
  • #5
well in answer to the hint. in order for everything in [f(b)-epsilon, f(b)+epsilon] to be less than f(a)-epsilon, f(b)+epsilon has to be less than f(a)-epsilon. rearranging this inequality we get f(a)-f(b)>2epsilon. ==> (f(a)-f(b))/2 > epsilon ==> epsilon + some number c = (f(a)-f(b))/2 ==> epsilon= (f(a)-f(b))/2 - c.
 
  • #6
l888l888l888 said:
well in answer to the hint. in order for everything in [f(b)-epsilon, f(b)+epsilon] to be less than f(a)-epsilon, f(b)+epsilon has to be less than f(a)-epsilon. rearranging this inequality we get f(a)-f(b)>2epsilon. ==> (f(a)-f(b))/2 > epsilon ==> epsilon + some number c = (f(a)-f(b))/2 ==> epsilon= (f(a)-f(b))/2 - c.

Indeed, this epsilon will make it all work! Btw, it's perfectly ok to say to choose [itex]\varepsilon<\frac{f(a)-f(b)}{2}[/itex]. You don't need to introduce the number c, but it's not wrong if you do.
 
  • #7
oh ok thanks so much. Your so helpful! :)
 

FAQ: Is the Set of Increasing Continuous Functions on [0,1] Closed?

What does it mean for something to be "closed"?

In the scientific context, something is considered "closed" when it is complete, finalized, or resolved. This means that all necessary factors and variables have been accounted for and the results are definitive.

How is something proven to be closed?

To prove that something is closed, it must go through a rigorous process of testing and analysis. This involves collecting data, performing experiments, and evaluating the results to ensure that all aspects have been considered and there are no gaps or uncertainties in the findings.

What makes a scientific study or experiment "closed"?

A scientific study or experiment is considered "closed" when all variables and factors have been controlled for and the results are consistent and repeatable. This means that the study has been conducted in a controlled and systematic manner, and the results can be replicated by other scientists.

Why is it important to prove that something is closed?

Proving that something is closed is crucial in scientific research because it ensures the validity and reliability of the findings. Without a closed and complete study, there may be doubts or uncertainties about the results, making it difficult for other scientists to build upon or replicate the study.

What are some common methods used to prove that something is closed?

Some common methods used to prove that something is closed include statistical analysis, peer review, and replication of the study by other scientists. These methods help to ensure that the study has been conducted thoroughly and accurately, leaving little room for error or doubt.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top