Is the Transformed Function a Solution to Laplace's Equation?

In summary, the conversation discusses proving that if \phi(x,y,z) is a solution of Laplace's equation, then \frac{1}{r}\phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is also a solution. The conversation includes a suggestion to compute the Laplacian of \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) and shows the necessary substitutions to simplify the calculations. The conversation ends with a request for more explicit steps to complete the problem.
  • #1
merrypark3
30
0

Homework Statement



Show that

If [itex]\phi[/itex](x,y,z) is a solution of Laplace's equation, show that
[itex]\frac{1}{r}\phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is also a solution


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



let [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is a solution.

Then in the spherical coordinate,

[itex]\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )[/itex]

So input [itex]\psi [/itex] to the spherical laplace equation.

[itex]\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\psi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r^4} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} - \frac{1}{r^3} \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2} [/itex]

The derivation with other angles, same to the original one, except 1/r times factor.

But the r part for the original one is

[itex]\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\phi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} + \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2} [/itex]

What's wrong with me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
merrypark3 said:
let [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] is a solution.

Here you are assuming what you are trying to prove. That is not usually a good idea.

Instead, just compute the Laplacian of [itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )[/itex] and show that it is zero if [itex]\nabla^2 \phi(x,y,z)=0[/itex]

Then in the spherical coordinate,

[itex]\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )[/itex]

No. What are [itex]x[/itex], [itex]y[/itex] and [itex]z[/itex] in terms of spherical coordinates [itex]r[/itex], [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\varphi[/itex]? What does that make [itex]\frac{x}{r^2}[/itex], [itex]\frac{y}{r^2}[/itex], and [itex]\frac{z}{r^2}[/itex]?
 
  • #3


[itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})[/itex]

[itex] \frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} ) [/itex]

Then how can I calculate the terms like [itex] \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}[/itex]?
 
  • #4
merrypark3 said:
[itex]\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})[/itex]

good.

[itex] \frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} ) [/itex]

Then how can I calculate the terms like [itex] \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}[/itex]?

Just use a substitution like [itex]\bar{x} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r}[/itex], [itex]\bar{y} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \sin\varphi}{r}[/itex], and [itex]\bar{z} \equiv \frac{\cos \theta}{r}[/itex] to make it easier to write:

[tex]\frac{\partial \phi\left( \frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} \right)}{\partial (\frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r})} = \frac{ \partial \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial \bar{x}}[/tex]?

In the end, you should get something like [itex]\nabla^2 \psi = \text{some factor} * \left[ \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{x}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{y}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{z}} \right][/itex]

Aside: Changing the size on all your posts makes them difficult to read (for my eyes anyways), please stop it.
 
  • #5
I am stuck on this too

Hi!

I was just trying to solve this problem through this same approach (make the substitutions [itex]\overline{x}=\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)/r[/itex], etc...). But it turns out to be *very* complicated. Do you have finished this one? Can you show me more explicit steps? Thanks a lot!
 

FAQ: Is the Transformed Function a Solution to Laplace's Equation?

What is the Laplace equation charge reflection?

The Laplace equation charge reflection is a mathematical equation that describes the distribution of electric charge on a surface in response to an electric field. It takes into account the electric potential, electric field, and material properties of the surface.

How is the Laplace equation charge reflection used in science?

The Laplace equation charge reflection is used in a variety of scientific fields, including physics, electrical engineering, and materials science. It helps to understand and predict the behavior of electric fields and charges on different surfaces, which is important for developing technologies such as electronic devices and energy storage systems.

What are the key assumptions of the Laplace equation charge reflection?

The Laplace equation charge reflection assumes that the electric potential is continuous and differentiable, that the electric field is conservative, and that the surface is made of a homogeneous and isotropic material. It also assumes that there are no external charges present.

What are the limitations of the Laplace equation charge reflection?

The Laplace equation charge reflection is a simplified model and does not take into account factors such as surface roughness, non-uniform material properties, and electric field distortions caused by nearby objects. These limitations may affect the accuracy of the predictions made using the equation.

How is the Laplace equation charge reflection related to other equations?

The Laplace equation charge reflection is closely related to other equations in electromagnetism, such as Gauss's law and Poisson's equation. It can also be derived from Maxwell's equations, which describe the fundamental laws of electric and magnetic fields. Additionally, the Laplace equation charge reflection can be extended to more complex situations, such as when there are multiple surfaces with different charge distributions.

Back
Top