Is There a Maximum Wavelength for Electromagnetic Radiation?

Click For Summary
There is no established maximum wavelength for electromagnetic radiation, as classical physics allows for arbitrarily long wavelengths, such as those corresponding to static electric fields. While theories suggest upper limits on frequency, there is no consensus on a lower limit for frequency or energy. The finite size of the universe introduces complex boundary conditions that complicate understanding of wavelengths at cosmic scales. Quantum theory indicates that photons can possess arbitrarily small energy since they have no rest mass, allowing for very low frequencies. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities and nuances in defining limits for electromagnetic radiation.
tomwilliam
Messages
142
Reaction score
3
Is there any lower limit on the frequency of electromagnetic radiation? I imagine that beyond a certain frequency it becomes impossible to detect, but is there anything in the maxwell equations that establishes a maximum wavelength (besides the limits of the size of the universe)?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure there isn't any constraint on how low the frequency can get, numerous theories do make some upper limits though.

As an aside, I'm not sure what effect even the finite size of the universe would have because of weird boundary conditions, and other cosmology stuff... I don't think any theory could accurately tell you the properties/details of wavelengths comparable to that of the universe; can anybody affirm/deny that?
 
Classically, the longest EM wave simply corresponds to a static electric field, such as point charge that is fixed in space. There is no classical limit to how slowly you can make it move (a body at rest tends to stay at rest).

Considering quantum theory and the uncertainty of known energy though, the answer is less obvious.
 
Several "popular" and more technical books I've read point out that there is no lower limit. The photon can have arbitrarily small energy, which means that the symmetry it embodies is perfect and unbroken. Because the photon has no rest mass, it can have an arbitrarily small energy.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
694