Is There Always a Real Number Between Two Arbitrary Real Numbers?

AI Thread Summary
For any two distinct real numbers x and y, there exists at least one real number z such that x < z < y, which can be demonstrated using the Archimedean Property. The midpoint (x+y)/2 serves as a valid example of such a z. The discussion clarifies that the original statement is true only if x and y are distinct, and that the property also holds for rational and complex numbers. The necessity of the real number condition is debated, emphasizing the broader applicability of the concept. Overall, the existence of a real number between two distinct arbitrary real numbers is affirmed.
courtrigrad
1,236
2
Hello all

I need help with the following proofs

1. If x and y are arbitrary real numbers, prove that there is at least one real z satisfying x < z < y. (Do I just use the Archimedian Property?)

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
courtrigrad said:
(Do I just use the Archimedian Property?)

Yep. :smile:
 
No. and it isn't true as stated.

x and y must be distinct, and the requirement of being R is unnecessary, since it is true for Q (and C).


what is (x+y)/2?
 
Good catch. I was thinking of rational numbers between arbitrary reals.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top