Is there any Limit to the kinetic energy

In summary, the SR model does not say that there is an upper limit to the energy or momentum that a body can gain. Kinetic energy is simply a function of rest mass and gamma, and since gamma is unbounded, so is kinetic energy. However, at a certain point the energy density would become large enough to form a black hole.
  • #1
raknath
61
0
Hi

Does SR predict any limit to the kinetic energy/momentum that the body can actually reach.

Given that the mass energy equivalence holds, how is it that there is no upper limit to the energy/mass that a body can gain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In SR, there is no upper limit. Kinetic energy is simply a function of rest mass and gamma, and since gamma is unbounded, so is kinetic energy.

However, I think at a certain point the energy density would become large enough to form a black hole. That might not be true though, but certainly the first statement is.
 
  • #3
However, I think at a certain point the energy density would become large enough to form a black hole.
No: velocity is relative, Black Holes are not.
But as you said, kinetic energy is unbounded, even if there is no rest mass.
 
  • #4
No i don't understand this.

If i assume that kinetic energy is essentially the energy gained on motion, then there needs to be an upper limit.

Essentially some velocity, assuming energy is gained through velocity cannot push infinite mass.

Also if we say that mass and energy are quite non divorcible then does mass contribute to the energy or velocity?
 
  • #5
Essentially some velocity, assuming energy is gained through velocity cannot push infinite mass.
Why not? Because E=m/2 v², or for what reason?
 
  • #6
Ich said:
Why not? Because E=m/2 v², or for what reason?
Yes , also i am assuming that the actual push is the acceleration tied to the velocity, which becomes zero when velocity is constant

Am i wrong here someway?
 
  • #7
Am i wrong here someway?
Yes, you missed the last 104 years.
Just a hint: [tex]E=m_0 c^2 \sqrt{\frac{1}{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex] - that's what Nabeshin meant. Plot this function and have a look at it.
But you should read some basic introduction to SR, it's hard to answer specific questions if there is nothing one could start from.
 
  • #8
Ich said:
Yes, you missed the last 104 years.
Just a hint: [tex]E=m_0 c^2 \sqrt{\frac{1}{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex] - that's what Nabeshin meant. Plot this function and have a look at it.
But you should read some basic introduction to SR, it's hard to answer specific questions if there is nothing one could start from.

Thats just the mass change with increase in velocity. I get that my question is how is this mass limited and if it is not why is it not?
 
  • #9
Thats just the mass change with increase in velocity. I get that my question is how is this mass limited and if it is not why is it not?
That's total energy, sometimes called "relativistic mass". If you subtract the rest energy, you get kinetic energy. So yes, you're asking if this total energy is unbounded. And it is, as far as we know.
 
  • #10
raknath said:
If i assume that kinetic energy is essentially the energy gained on motion, then there needs to be an upper limit.
Let's assume that you are correct and there is some finite maximum energy. Now, suppose we have an object traveling with that energy. Since it is finite we know that v<c. If we then shine a single photon on that object we know that the photon will eventually reach the object (since the photon is going faster). When it reaches the object, by conservation of energy and momentum, the energy and momentum of the object must increase which would make it greater than the maximum, which is a logical contradiction. Therefore there cannot be any finite maximum energy.
 
  • #11
DaleSpam said:
Let's assume that you are correct and there is some finite maximum energy. Now, suppose we have an object traveling with that energy. Since it is finite we know that v<c. If we then shine a single photon on that object we know that the photon will eventually reach the object (since the photon is going faster). When it reaches the object, by conservation of energy and momentum, the energy and momentum of the object must increase which would make it greater than the maximum, which is a logical contradiction. Therefore there cannot be any finite maximum energy.

I was talking about bodies moving with the speed of light, i.e that is the maximum speed that the body can attain, so even something at the speed of light can't catch up with it
 
  • #12
raknath said:
I was talking about bodies moving with the speed of light, i.e that is the maximum speed that the body can attain, so even something at the speed of light can't catch up with it
Use the equation Ich posted and tell me, what finite energy can you give to a 1kg mass so that it moves with the speed of light?
 

FAQ: Is there any Limit to the kinetic energy

What is kinetic energy?

Kinetic energy is the energy that an object possesses due to its motion. It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its current velocity.

Is there a limit to kinetic energy?

According to the laws of physics, there is no limit to the amount of kinetic energy an object can possess. As long as an object is in motion, it will have some amount of kinetic energy.

Can an object have unlimited kinetic energy?

Technically, yes. If an object continues to gain speed and never stops, it will continue to gain kinetic energy without limit. However, in reality, there are factors such as air resistance and friction that will eventually cause the object to slow down and reach a maximum velocity.

How is kinetic energy calculated?

The formula for calculating kinetic energy is 1/2 * mass * velocity^2. This means that the kinetic energy of an object is directly proportional to its mass and the square of its velocity.

What are some real-life examples of kinetic energy?

Some common examples of kinetic energy in everyday life include a moving car, a swinging pendulum, a rolling ball, and a person running. Even the smallest particles, such as atoms and molecules, possess kinetic energy due to their constant motion.

Similar threads

Back
Top