Is There Evidence for the Universe's Expansion and a Constant Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Drmarshall
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Universe
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of space and its expansion, as well as the evidence for the constant speed of light and the idea of variable speed of light theories. There is also a discussion about the importance of approaching new ideas with a critical mindset rather than assuming established science is wrong.
  • #1
Drmarshall
31
0
Every atom in the universe is 99.99% space.
So if space were "expanding" (compared to what!) every atom in my metre rule would be expanding. So there is no MEASURABLE expansion

Where is the EVIDENCE that the speed of light has "stayed constant" over the past 15 billion years. Compared to what?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Variable speed of light theories persist to this day, despite the lack of unambiguous evidence in support of the idea. It is, at best, viewed as highly speculative.
 
  • #3
Drmarshall said:
The universe CANNOT expand

Uh ... really ?


When you come up against something that flies so utterly in the face of established science, it is not a good idea to start off reaching different conclusions and stating them as correct but rather to start off with the assumption that you have made a mistake somewhere and try to find out where it is. If you have NOT made a mistake you will find the flaw in the established science, but that is very unlikely to happen. If you start off thinking that you have overturned established science you are likely to just end up embarrassed.
 
  • #4
This is not a valid thread start.

Asking questions is OK, but making a bunch of incorrect statements in the hope of learning that way is not. It's both inefficient and annoying.
 
  • #5


I understand the concept of the expansion of the universe and the evidence that supports it. The statement that the universe cannot expand because every atom is mostly space is not entirely accurate. While it is true that atoms are mostly empty space, it is the space between atoms that is expanding, not the atoms themselves. This expansion is measured by looking at the distances between galaxies, not individual atoms.

The evidence for the constant speed of light over the past 15 billion years comes from various observations and experiments, such as the study of cosmic microwave background radiation and the measurement of the redshift of distant objects. These studies have consistently shown that the speed of light has remained constant over time and space. Additionally, the theories of general and special relativity also support the notion of a constant speed of light.

It is important to note that the concept of the expansion of the universe is not something that can be measured with a ruler or meter stick. It is a phenomenon that is observed and studied through various scientific methods and technologies. The evidence for the expansion of the universe is based on observations and data from a variety of sources, and it is constantly being refined and updated as our understanding of the universe grows.

In summary, as a scientist, I can confidently say that there is ample evidence to support the expansion of the universe and the constant speed of light. These concepts have been extensively studied and validated by numerous experiments and observations. While it may seem counterintuitive, the expansion of the universe is a well-supported and accepted scientific theory.
 

FAQ: Is There Evidence for the Universe's Expansion and a Constant Speed of Light?

1. What evidence supports the idea that the universe is not expanding?

There are several pieces of evidence that support the idea that the universe is not expanding. One is the observation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which appears to be uniform in all directions. If the universe were expanding, we would expect to see variations in this radiation. Additionally, the distribution of galaxies in the universe does not show the expected pattern if the universe is expanding.

2. How do scientists measure the expansion of the universe?

Scientists measure the expansion of the universe by observing the redshift of light from distant galaxies. When an object is moving away from us, the wavelength of its light appears to be stretched, causing it to shift towards the red end of the spectrum. By measuring this redshift, scientists can determine how fast an object is moving away from us and therefore the expansion rate of the universe.

3. What is the alternative explanation for the redshift of light from distant galaxies?

The alternative explanation for the redshift of light from distant galaxies is the tired light theory. This theory suggests that the redshift is not caused by the expansion of the universe, but rather by the gradual loss of energy as light travels through space. However, this theory does not have as much evidence to support it as the expansion theory.

4. Can the expansion of the universe be explained by other theories, such as the Big Bang?

Yes, the expansion of the universe is a key component of the Big Bang theory, which is the most widely accepted explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe. The Big Bang theory states that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since.

5. What impact would the discovery that the universe is not expanding have on our understanding of the universe?

If it were definitively proven that the universe is not expanding, it would challenge our current understanding of the universe and require a reassessment of many theories and models. It would also call into question the validity of the Big Bang theory and potentially open up new avenues for scientific exploration and understanding of the universe.

Back
Top