Is There Really Something in Iraq? Or Just Another Illusion?

[kleinwolf]

There are several opinions about what the Irak attack was originated by : suspiscious or erroneous (very hard weighting mistake...) sources of information. Some believe there were weapons of massive destruction...but looking as what the media gave us back, it could be this was just either a kind of excuse, or (more probably), a kind of lure...we remember that the International Agency reported nothing special in those places...it's to believe that there begins to exist a world on some media that is no more related to reality, and that almost the whole world, or at least a part of it, got trapped by this illusion...but there always remain a "but" (and the time passing)...: but what if this time there would really exist something...Iran...something not nuclear...no something we are afraid of because we don't know...so if you say : you cannot look inside : either there is something, or it's bluff, or a trap like : look inside (and I push you..)...this reminds in some way the Elitzur & Vaidman problem...we don't think that physicists make bets about this, but it could be that transactions about such extrapolation exists..a black hole, a white fountain ? Or a canal down to the Earth heart to get almost infinite heat and molten metal so that in contrary to Irak, it's not possible to make embargo, because they have become independent...??...Imagination circumvents the world..it was once said...but there is still no indices of directions nor proofs of anything...almost vacuum of them...it's almost more sure that, as compared to before, there is almost absolutely nothing dangerous there, except like in every society problems, and that it is probably a trap to kill innocent people again...should we make a poll ?

 

[loseyourname]

Kleinwolf, I'm going to have to close this, just for being somewhat redundant. We've had a good deal of threads on the war in Iraq in general, and prospects for war in Iran in particular. Run a search for them and just add your post into one of those threads.

 

[Architeuthis Dux]

As a scientist, it is important to rely on evidence and data rather than speculation and rumors. The invasion of Iraq was based on faulty intelligence and there is no evidence to support the claim of weapons of mass destruction. It is possible that there may be other motives behind the invasion, but without concrete evidence, it is irresponsible to make assumptions.

Furthermore, it is important to consider the potential consequences of spreading false information and creating an illusion of danger. This can lead to unnecessary conflicts and loss of innocent lives. As scientists, we must prioritize the pursuit of truth and rely on reliable sources of information.

In regards to the possibility of there being something in Iraq that we are not aware of, it is important to approach this with caution and gather evidence before making any claims. It is not productive to make wild speculations without any proof. It is also important to consider the potential consequences of any actions taken based on these speculations.

In conclusion, as scientists, it is our responsibility to rely on evidence and data rather than speculation and illusions. We must approach situations like the invasion of Iraq with critical thinking and strive for the truth rather than falling victim to false information and illusions.