- #1
jevanuD
- 11
- 0
jevanuD said:I am aware that [M]\tan\left({}\right)[/M] = \sin\left({}\right)/\cos\left({}\right) and the other fundamental which is [M]\:1-\cos ^2\left(x\right)=\sin ^2\left(x\right)[/M] i just need some clarity on how its proven.
MarkFL said:Use the $\sum$ button to wrap your code, instead of the M button. ;)
The two identities you cited:
\(\displaystyle \tan(\theta)=\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}\)
\(\displaystyle 1-\cos^2(\theta)=\sin^2(\theta)\)
will be very useful for the first problem...can you use them to make some substitutions?
jevanuD said:Yes correct, I've made my substitutions to prove that question A is indeed true, however i am not sure how to start "B"
MarkFL said:For the first part of part (b), multiply through by $\sin(\theta)$ to get a quadratic in $\sin(\theta)$. Then factor...what do you get?
jevanuD said:\(\displaystyle 3\sin\left({\theta}\right){}^{2}=3\)?
MarkFL said:No, let's start with:
\(\displaystyle 3\sin(\theta)=2+\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}\)
Multiply through by $\sin(\theta)$ to get:
\(\displaystyle 3\sin^2(\theta)=2\sin(\theta)+1\)
Arrange in standard form:
\(\displaystyle 3\sin^2(\theta)-2\sin(\theta)-1=0\)
Now factor...what do you get?
jevanuD said:\(\displaystyle \sin\left({\theta}\right)\left(3\sin\left({\theta}\right)-3\right)=0\)
MarkFL said:No...what if I ask you to factor:
\(\displaystyle 3x^2-2x-1=0\)
jevanuD said:\(\displaystyle \left(3x+1\right)\left(x-1\right)\)
MarkFL said:Excellent...the same applies whether you have the quadratic in $x$ or $\sin(\theta)$ or any other expression. So, this gives you:
\(\displaystyle \left(3\sin(\theta)+1\right)\left(\sin(\theta)-1\right)=0\)
From this, of course, we get:
\(\displaystyle \sin(\theta)=-\frac{1}{3}\)
\(\displaystyle \sin(\theta)=1\)
Can you see how many solutions you are going to have, and in which quadrants?
jevanuD said:Are you saying I should plot my 2 solutions into: \(\displaystyle {0}^{0}\le\theta\le360^{0}\)
MarkFL said:What I would do is plot the unit circle, and the lines $y=1$ and \(\displaystyle y=-\frac{1}{3}\)...
From this graph, can you see how many solutions we're going to have on the required interval?
jevanuD said:from that I'm seeing 3 points marked, which is 3 solutions?
MarkFL said:Yes, and we should know immediately that:
\(\displaystyle \theta=90^{\circ}\)
is a solution corresponding to the intersection with the circle and the line $y=1$. Now, for the other two solutions, in quadrants III and IV, there are several ways you could approach finding them, and what I would do is observe they are symmetric about $270^{\circ}$...and so I would write:
\(\displaystyle \theta=\left(\frac{3\pi}{2}\pm\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)\right)\frac{180^{\circ}}{\pi}\)
Does that make sense?
jevanuD said:wow I am lost there, but i would then solve this equation?
MarkFL said:Another approach we could use is to observe that the two solutions will be of the form:
\(\displaystyle \theta=360^{\circ}-\beta\)
\(\displaystyle \theta=180^{\circ}+\beta\)
Do you see what the reference angle $\beta$ must be?
jevanuD said:We've only stated 2 angles 90 and 270, is it either of those?
A trigonometric identity is an equation that is true for all possible values of the variables involved. It is used to express the relationship between different trigonometric functions and can be proven using mathematical manipulation or geometric representations.
Proving trigonometric identities is important because it helps to verify the accuracy of mathematical statements and solve complex equations involving trigonometric functions. It also improves problem-solving skills and understanding of the underlying principles of trigonometry.
The most common methods for proving trigonometric identities include using basic algebraic manipulation, converting to a common denominator, using the fundamental identities, and using geometric representations such as the unit circle or right triangle.
A trigonometric identity is considered true if it is satisfied for all possible values of the variables involved. This can be checked by substituting various values for the variables and verifying that the equation holds true.
No, not all trigonometric identities can be proven. Some identities, known as conditional identities, are only true for specific values of the variables involved. These identities cannot be proven using algebraic or geometric methods and require a different approach, such as using calculus or complex numbers.