- #1
hacivat
- 28
- 3
Sorry for the speculative title but, I kind of think so. Both subjects are great discoveries and maybe they deserve the prize on their own (maybe not that is not my point). My point is how are they connected to each other under the vague umbrella term: "Complex systems". Their subjects are WAY different, their methods are WAY different.
I think this is the first time a physics Nobel prize is shared between totally different domains both in subject and method. Please look at the range of topics mentioned under the title "Complex systems" in Wikipedia:
"Complex systems is therefore often used as a broad term encompassing a research approach to problems in many diverse disciplines, including statistical physics, information theory, nonlinear dynamics, anthropology, computer science, meteorology, sociology, economics, psychology, and biology."
I think this is the first time a physics Nobel prize is shared between totally different domains both in subject and method. Please look at the range of topics mentioned under the title "Complex systems" in Wikipedia:
"Complex systems is therefore often used as a broad term encompassing a research approach to problems in many diverse disciplines, including statistical physics, information theory, nonlinear dynamics, anthropology, computer science, meteorology, sociology, economics, psychology, and biology."