Is this a Killing vector field?

  • #1
ergospherical
1,019
1,299
There is a gravitational wave spacetime described by$$g = a(u) (x^2-y^2)du^2 + 2du dw + dx^2 + dy^2$$There is one obvious Killing vector field, ##\partial/\partial w \equiv \partial_w##. To find some more, it's suggested to try:$$X = xf(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial w} + p(u) \frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$In principle, you could compute the connection coefficients, write out Killing's equation, and verify each component. But that is generally tedious, so instead I thought it may be easier to use directly the condition ##L_X g = 0##. Explicitly,\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= L_{xf \partial_w} g + L_{p \partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ xf L_{\partial_w} g + d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g \right] + \left[ p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g\right] \\
&= d(xf) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + dp \wedge i_{\partial_x} g \\ \\
&= (fdx + xf'(u) du) \wedge i_{\partial_w} g + p L_{\partial_x} g + p'(u) du \wedge i_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}
where I used ##L_{\partial_w} g = 0##. Here ##i_{\partial_w} g## and ##i_{\partial_x} g## are one-forms with components \begin{align*}
(i_{\partial_w} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{w\alpha} = g_{wu} \delta^u_{\alpha} \\
(i_{\partial_x} g)_{\alpha} &= g_{x\alpha} = g_{xx} \delta^x_{\alpha}
\end{align*}Any ideas how to find conditions on ##f(u)## and ##p(u)## for ##X## to be Killing? Maybe just a case of expanding out the terms, which is probably a good idea to try...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In fact, you can re-write it as\begin{align*}
0 = L_X g &= (f(u)g_{uu} - p'(u) g_{xx}) dx \wedge du + pL_{\partial_x} g \\
&= \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du + p L_{\partial_x} g
\end{align*}So you need to arrange$$L_{\partial_x} g = - \frac{1}{p(u)} \left[ f(u)a(u)(x^2-y^2) - p'(u) \right] dx \wedge du$$...? That can't be it...
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
950
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top