Is this breaking any math rules

  • Thread starter vande060
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rules
In summary, the individual solved the integral ∫ √(x^2 +1) dx from 0 to 1 using substitution and integration by parts. They reached the point of I = 1/2secϑtanϑ + 1/2ln |secϑ + tanϑ| from 0 to pi/4 and understood the derivation process. The final answer is - (1/2sec(pi/4) + 1/2ln |sec(pi/4) +1|) + (1/2sec(0) + 1/2ln |sec
  • #1
vande060
186
0

Homework Statement



I think I have a neat way of solving this bugger, but I'm not sure if it is a mathematically "legal" route. I don't know if there is a smarter way to solve this or not..

∫ √(x^2 +1) dx from 0 to 1



The Attempt at a Solution



I = ∫ √(x^2 +1) dx

x= tanϑ
√(x^2 +1) = secϑ
dx = sec^2ϑ
x(0) = 0
x(1) = pi/4
-pi/2 < ϑ < pi/2

I = ∫ secϑsec^2ϑ dϑ
= ∫secϑ(1 + tan^2ϑ) dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑtan^2ϑ dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ(1 + sec^2ϑ) dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫ secϑsec^2ϑ dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ dϑ + I

2I = 2∫secϑ dϑ
I = ln |secϑ + tanϑ| + C from 0 to pi/4
I = ln| (2/√2) + 1| - 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
vande060 said:

Homework Statement



I think I have a neat way of solving this bugger, but I'm not sure if it is a mathematically "legal" route. I don't know if there is a smarter way to solve this or not..

∫ √(x^2 +1) dx from 0 to 1



The Attempt at a Solution



I = ∫ √(x^2 +1) dx

x= tanϑ
√(x^2 +1) = secϑ
dx = sec^2ϑ
x(0) = 0
x(1) = pi/4
-pi/2 < ϑ < pi/2

I = ∫ secϑsec^2ϑ dϑ
= ∫secϑ(1 + tan^2ϑ) dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑtan^2ϑ dϑ
There's a mistake in the next line. tan2(ϑ) = sec2(ϑ) - 1

In the line above, the first integral turns out to be ln|sec(ϑ) + tan(ϑ)|. The usual trick for the second integral is integration by parts, with u = tan(ϑ) and dv = sec(ϑ)tan(ϑ)dϑ. You should end up with another integral of sec3(ϑ). See this wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_of_secant_cubed
vande060 said:
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ(1 + sec^2ϑ) dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫ secϑsec^2ϑ dϑ
= ∫secϑ dϑ + ∫secϑ dϑ + I

2I = 2∫secϑ dϑ
I = ln |secϑ + tanϑ| + C from 0 to pi/4
I = ln| (2/√2) + 1| - 0
 
  • #3
all right i understand, let me go through it...

all right i understand, let me go through it...

i was able to solve the integral to the point of

I = 1/2secϑtanϑ + 1/2ln |secϑ + tanϑ| from 0 to pi/4

i did the derivation by myself in parts like the wiki page and understand it, thank you

so my final answer should be:

I = - (1/2sec(pi/4) + 1/2ln |sec(pi/4) +1|)
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Is this breaking any math rules

What are some common math rules?

Some common math rules include the order of operations (PEMDAS), the commutative and associative properties, and the distributive property.

What does it mean for something to break a math rule?

When something breaks a math rule, it means that it goes against the established principles and conventions of doing math. This can lead to incorrect calculations and results.

How can I tell if something breaks a math rule?

The best way to tell if something breaks a math rule is to carefully check your calculations and ensure that you are following the correct procedures and principles. You can also consult a math textbook or ask a teacher for clarification.

What happens if I break a math rule?

If you break a math rule, it may result in incorrect calculations and answers. It is important to follow math rules in order to obtain accurate results and avoid errors.

Can math rules ever be broken?

While there are some basic principles and conventions in math that should always be followed, there are also instances where certain rules can be bent or even broken in certain situations. This often occurs in advanced math and can lead to new discoveries and advancements in the field.

Similar threads

Back
Top