Is this induction proof correct?

In summary: This is just a statement about the value of cos(x) at x=2. You need to provide some evidence that cos(x) actually has a value between cos(1) and cos(0).We assume that Pn is true for n=k, where k ≥ 2:This is the statement that you're trying to prove. So you should start your proof by proving that Pn is true.
  • #1
johann1301
217
1

Homework Statement



The sequence {xn} is given by the recurrence relation

xn = cos(xn-1)sin(xn-2) for n ≥ 2

and x0=2 and x1=1,4. Show by induction that 0 ≤ xn ≤ 1 for all integers n ≥ 2.

The Attempt at a Solution



We formulate a statement:

Pn: 0 ≤ xn = cos(xn-1)sin(xn-2) ≤ 1 for n ≥ 2
---------------------------------------------------------------

We assume that Pn is true for n=k, where k ≥ 2:

Ak: 0 ≤ xk = cos(xk-1)sin(xk-2) ≤ 1 for k ≥ 2

We then set n=k+1:

xk+1 = cos(xk)sin(xk-1)

We know from the assumption Ak that:

0 ≤ xk ≤ 1

This implies that:

0,54 ≤ cos(xk) ≤ 1 which again implies 0 < cos(xk) < 1

We then have to show:

0 ≤ sin(xk-1) ≤ 1

We know that sine to any angle is always equal to or less then 1. We therefore have to prove:

0 ≤ sin(xk-1)

Since we assumed that 0 ≤ xk ≤ 1, this must be true for xk-1 as well. This means that if the assumption Ak is true when n=k, its true when n=k+1 also. The last thing is to prove the base case:

x2 = cos(1,4)sin(2) ≈ 0,155

0 ≤ 0,155 ≤ 1

Pn is thus true.

Is this correct argumentation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm trying to follow along, but how is it that

[itex]0 \leq x_k \leq 1 \Rightarrow 0.54 \leq cos(x_k) \leq 1 [/itex]?

Also, are you trying to use strong induction or weak induction?
 
  • #3
Mogarrr said:
I'm trying to follow along, but how is it that

[itex]0 \leq x_k \leq 1 \Rightarrow 0.54 \leq cos(x_k) \leq 1 [/itex]?

Also, are you trying to use strong induction or weak induction?

Strong induction.

Since the value of xk is always between 0 and 1 radians, the value of cos(xk) has to lie between cos(1)≈0.5403... and cos(0)=1. If you plot cos(x) from x=0 to x=1 you will see that the values of cos(x) lies between 0.5403 and 1.
 
  • #4
johann1301 said:
We formulate a statement:

Pn: 0 ≤ xn = cos(xn-1)sin(xn-2) ≤ 1 for n ≥ 2
You shouldn't write out the definition of ##x_n## in the middle of your definition of ##P(n)##. Just say that for each integer n such that ##n\geq 2##, P(n) is the statement ##0\leq x_n\leq 1##. Your goal is to prove P(n) for all integers n such that ##n\geq 2##. To do this by induction is to prove the following two statements:

##P(2)##
For all integers n such that ##n\geq 2##, if P(n) then P(n+1).

johann1301 said:
We assume that Pn is true for n=k, where k ≥ 2:
This is poorly worded. It sounds like you're talking about some specific but unspecified integer k that's greater than or equal to 2. So you're saying that one of the infinitely many statements P(2), P(3), etc. is true, and you're not saying which one. I can't interpret the statement as a "for all k" statement either, because then it would be saying that all of the statements P(2), P(3), etc. are true. This is the result that you're trying to prove.

What you need to say here is this: Let n be an arbitrary integer such that n≥2. We will prove that if P(n) then P(n+1). So suppose that P(n) is true.

Note however that this is not sufficient to prove the theorem. You also need to prove P(2).
 

FAQ: Is this induction proof correct?

What is induction proof?

Induction proof is a mathematical technique used to prove that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It involves using a base case and an inductive step to show that the statement holds for all numbers.

How do I know if my induction proof is correct?

To determine if an induction proof is correct, you need to ensure that the base case is true and that the inductive step follows logically from the base case. You should also check that the inductive step is valid for all natural numbers.

Can I use induction to prove any statement?

No, induction can only be used to prove statements that are true for all natural numbers. It cannot be used to prove statements that involve real numbers or irrational numbers.

What if my induction proof does not work for a certain number?

If your induction proof does not work for a certain number, it means that the statement is not true for that number. You may need to revise your proof or find a counterexample to show that the statement is not always true.

Are there any alternative methods to induction for proving statements?

Yes, there are other techniques such as proof by contradiction or direct proof that can be used to prove statements. However, induction is a powerful and commonly used method for proving statements involving natural numbers.

Back
Top