Is this matrix diagonalizable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the diagonalizability of two matrices based on their characteristic polynomials. The first matrix has a characteristic polynomial of (x+1)(x-4)^2, leading to confusion about the multiplicity and the dimension of the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 4. The second matrix's characteristic polynomial is (λ +3)^2 (λ -8), raising questions about the dimension of the eigenspace for the eigenvalue -3. It is clarified that the algebraic multiplicity (AM) can exceed the geometric multiplicity (GM), which indicates that the matrix is not diagonalizable due to insufficient independent eigenvectors. Understanding the relationship between AM and GM is crucial for determining a matrix's diagonalizability.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
is htis matrix diagonalizable?
\left( \begin{array}{ccc}4&0&0\\0&2&2\\2&3&1 \end{array} \right)
the characteristic polynomial is (x+1)(x-4)^2
whats worng with the multiplicity here?
the back of the book says dim(E4) =1 and here multiplicity is 2?

but what about this problem
\left( \begin{array}{ccc}3&0&6\\0&-3&0\\5&0&2 \end{array} \right)
whose characteristic polynomial is (\lambda +3)^2 (\lambda -8) = C_{A} (x)
here the multiplicity of lambda = -3 is 2 and the dim(E_{-3}) = ?? <br /> what is the dimension of E (-3)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dimension of the eigenspace of -3 is the number of independent eigenvectors you can find for the eigenvalue -3. This will be either 1 or 2 eigenvectors. To find them, row reduce (A - (-3)I)x = 0.
 
There's a difference between the algebraic multiplicity (AM, which is the multiplicity of the root in the characteristic polynomial) and the geometric multiplicity (GM, which is the dimension of the eigenspace belonging to that eigenvalue, so the number of linearly independant eigenvectors).
When AM > GM for a certain eigenvalue (GM > AM isn't possible), then the matrix is not diagonalizable since you won't have enough linearly independant eigenvectors.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K